Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24833680›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2014

Balance and walking after three different models of stroke rehabilitation: early supported discharge in a day unit or at home, and traditional treatment (control).

Bente Elisabeth Bassøe Gjelsvik, Håkon Hofstad, Tori Smedal, Geir Egil Eide, Halvor Næss, Jan Sture Skouen, Bente Frisk, Silje Daltveit, Liv Inger Strand

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00771771 (Early Supported Discharge After Stroke in Bergen. An RCT Looking at the Collaboration Between Hospital Service and Primary Health Care.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00771771 nacompletednot on this map

Early Supported Discharge After Stroke in Bergen. An RCT Looking at the Collaboration Between Hospital Service and Primary Health Care.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaukeland University HospitalRan2008 to 2013Enrolled306ConditionsStrokeArmsEarly supported discharge with day unit rehabilitation, Early supported discharge with home rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Early supported discharge services for people with acute stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Early Occupational Therapy Intervention in the Hospital Discharge after Stroke.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bente Elisabeth Bassøe GjelsvikDepartment of Physiotherapy, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Physiotherapy Research Group, University of Bergen, Norway.
Håkon HofstadDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Physiotherapy Research Group, University of Bergen, Norway Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Tori SmedalDepartment of Physiotherapy, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Geir Egil EideCentre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Halvor NæssDepartment of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway Centre for Age-related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Jan Sture SkouenDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Physiotherapy Research Group, University of Bergen, Norway Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Bente FriskDepartment of Physiotherapy, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Silje DaltveitDepartment of Physiotherapy, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Liv Inger StrandDepartment of Physiotherapy, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Physiotherapy Research Group, University of Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the effects on balance and walking of three models of stroke rehabilitation: early supported discharge with rehabilitation in a day unit or at home, and traditional uncoordinated treatment (control).

designGroup comparison study within a randomised controlled trial.

settingHospital stroke unit and primary healthcare.

participantsINCLUSION CRITERIA: a score of 2-26 on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, assessed with Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), and discharge directly home from the hospital stroke unit.

interventionsTwo intervention groups were given early supported discharge with treatment in either a day unit or the patient's own home. The controls were offered traditional, uncoordinated treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: PASS. Secondary: Trunk Impairment Scale-modified Norwegian version; timed Up-and-Go; 5 m timed walk; self-reports on problems with walking, balance, ADL, physical activity, pain and tiredness. The patients were tested before randomisation and 3 months after inclusion.

resultsFrom a total of 306 randomised patients, 167 were tested with PASS at baseline and discharged directly home. 105 were retested at 3 months: mean age 69 years, 63 men, 27 patients in day unit rehabilitation, 43 in home rehabilitation and 35 in a control group. There were no group differences, either at baseline for demographic and test data or for length of stroke unit stay. At 3 months, there was no group difference in change on PASS (p>0.05). Some secondary measures tended to show better outcome for the intervention groups, that is, trunk control, median (95% CI): day unit, 2 (0.28 to 2.31); home rehabilitation, 4 (1.80 to 3.78); control, 1 (0.56 to 2.53), p=0.044; and for self-report on walking, p=0.021 and ADL, p=0.016.

conclusionsThere was no difference in change between the groups for postural balance, but the secondary outcomes indicated that improvement of trunk control and walking was better in the intervention groups than in the control group.

trial registrationThis study is part of the Early Supported Discharge after Stroke in Bergen, ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00771771).

Indexed as

Postural BalanceStroke RehabilitationWalkingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDay Care, MedicalFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalNeurological RehabilitationPatient DischargeSingle-Blind MethodREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID24833680
PMCPMC4025466
OpenAlexW2111949024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.