ArticleEndocrine2015
Safety and specificity of the growth hormone suppression test in patients with diabetes.
Article in Endocrine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2025Review
- The Biochemical Diagnosis of Acromegaly.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Is GH nadir during OGTT a reliable test for diagnosis of acromegaly in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism?Endocrine · 2019Article
- Review
- Long-term follow-up of patients with elevated IGF-1 and nadir GH > 0.4 µg/L but < 1 µg/L.Archives of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and its capacity to suppress growth hormone (GH) in diabetic patients without acromegaly. A total of 135 diabetic patients submitted to the OGTT for GH suppression were studied. The following selection criteria were applied: age between 20 and 70 years; body mass index≥18.5 and ≤27 kg/m2; absence of kidney, liver, or thyroid disease; no use of estrogens, androgens, corticosteroids, or levothyroxine. Adequate suppression of GH was defined as a nadir below the cut-off established for a sample of 200 normoglycemic subjects (<0.25 µg/L for men, <0.74 µg/L for premenopausal women, and <0.5 µg/L for postmenopausal women). Acromegaly was diagnosed in five patients. Among the 130 diabetic patients without known pituitary disease or a clinical suspicion of acromegaly, 95.5% of men, 94% of premenopausal women, and 96.6% of postmenopausal women presented adequate GH suppression (vs 97.5% of normoglycemic controls). In all patients without acromegaly, the lowest GH levels (nadir) were achieved after the administration of glucose and not during baseline measurement. None of the patients had acute complications [ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar state, and symptomatic marked hyperglycemia (>300 mg/dL)] on the day of the test and up to 3 days thereafter. We demonstrated the safety of the OGTT and its capacity to suppress GH in diabetic patients without acromegaly. In addition, we suggest the adoption of a protocol to prevent possible risks of the OGTT in patients with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24833548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.