ArticleBiology2013
DNA damage response in plants: conserved and variable response compared to animals.
Article in Biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- ATM/p53-Associated Apoptosis Contributes to Sterility in Allotriploid Crucian Carp.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Article
- Growth under pressure: The pros and cons of polyploidy induced by stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Review
- A synthetic benzoxazine dimer derivative targets c-Myc to inhibit colorectal cancer progression.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Extraordinary variation in radiation tolerance: Mechanisms and evolution.The Journal of heredity · 2025Review
- STEMIN transcription factor drives selective chromatin remodeling for gene activation within a relaxed chromatin during reprogramming in the moss Physcomitrium patens.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Molecular underpinnings ofPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025Article
- Molecular aspects of heat stress sensing in land plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
- The Dose Rate of Corpuscular Ionizing Radiation Strongly Influences the Severity of DNA Damage, Cell Cycle Progression and Cellular Senescence in Human Epidermoid Carcinoma Cells.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- How to use CRISPR/Cas9 in plants: from target site selection to DNA repair.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Review
- Dynamic interplay of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS) in plant resilience: unveiling the signaling pathways and metabolic responses to biotic and abiotic stresses.Plant cell reports · 2024Review
- Identification of plants' functional counterpart of the metazoan mediator of DNA Damage checkpoint 1.EMBO reports · 2024Article
- Unveiling the structure and interactions of SOG1, a NAC domain transcription factor: An in-silico perspective.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of prognostic value and immune infiltration of Regulator of Chromosome Condensation 2 in lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- DNA Damage Response Mechanisms in Model Systems.Genes · 2023Article
- MDF is a conserved splicing factor and modulates cell division and stress response inLife science alliance · 2023Article
- The plant-specific DDR factor SOG1 increases chromatin mobility in response to DNA damage.EMBO reports · 2022Article
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genome of an organism is under constant attack from endogenous and exogenous DNA damaging factors, such as reactive radicals, radiation, and genotoxins. Therefore, DNA damage response systems to sense DNA damage, arrest cell cycle, repair DNA lesions, and/or induce programmed cell death are crucial for maintenance of genomic integrity and survival of the organism. Genome sequences revealed that, although plants possess many of the DNA damage response factors that are present in the animal systems, they are missing some of the important regulators, such as the p53 tumor suppressor. These observations suggest differences in the DNA damage response mechanisms between plants and animals. In this review the DNA damage responses in plants and animals are compared and contrasted. In addition, the function of SUPPRESSOR OF GAMMA RESPONSE 1 (SOG1), a plant-specific transcription factor that governs the robust response to DNA damage, is discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.