Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24833225›Full record

ArticleBiology2013

Algorithms for hidden markov models restricted to occurrences of regular expressions.

Paula Tataru, Andreas Sand, Asger Hobolth, Thomas Mailund, Christian N S Pedersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paula TataruBioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, C. F. Møllers Allé 8, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. paula@birc.au.dk.
Andreas SandBioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, C. F. Møllers Allé 8, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. asand@birc.au.dk.
Asger HobolthBioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, C. F. Møllers Allé 8, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. hobolth@birc.au.dk.
Thomas MailundBioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, C. F. Møllers Allé 8, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. mailund@birc.au.dk.
Christian N S PedersenBioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, C. F. Møllers Allé 8, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. cstorm@birc.au.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) are widely used probabilistic models, particularly for annotating sequential data with an underlying hidden structure. Patterns in the annotation are often more relevant to study than the hidden structure itself. A typical HMM analysis consists of annotating the observed data using a decoding algorithm and analyzing the annotation to study patterns of interest. For example, given an HMM modeling genes in DNA sequences, the focus is on occurrences of genes in the annotation. In this paper, we define a pattern through a regular expression and present a restriction of three classical algorithms to take the number of occurrences of the pattern in the hidden sequence into account. We present a new algorithm to compute the distribution of the number of pattern occurrences, and we extend the two most widely used existing decoding algorithms to employ information from this distribution. We show experimentally that the expectation of the distribution of the number of pattern occurrences gives a highly accurate estimate, while the typical procedure can be biased in the sense that the identified number of pattern occurrences does not correspond to the true number. We furthermore show that using this distribution in the decoding algorithms improves the predictive power of the model.

Identifiers

PMID24833225
PMCPMC4009796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.