Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24833203›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2014

Utilization and costs of medications associated with CKD mineral and bone disorder in dialysis patients enrolled in Medicare Part D.

Akeem A Yusuf, Benjamin L Howell, Christopher A Powers, Wendy L St Peter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Getting Out of the Phosphate Bind: Trials to Guide Treatment Targets.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2017
    Article
  11. Tip-toeing toward the finish line.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akeem A YusufChronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN; University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN.
Benjamin L HowellCenter for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
Christopher A PowersCenter for Strategic Planning, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
Wendy L St PeterChronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN; University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN. Electronic address: wstpeter@cdrg.org.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services · USOrthopaedic Research Foundation · US

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS HHSN267200715002C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation is limited regarding utilization patterns and costs for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) medications in Medicare Part D-enrolled dialysis patients. STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study. SETTING &

participantsAnnual cohorts of dialysis patients, 2007-2010. PREDICTORS: Cohort year, low-income subsidy status, and dialysis provider. OUTCOMES: Utilization and costs of prescription phosphate binders, oral and intravenous vitamin D analogues, and cinacalcet. MEASUREMENTS: Using logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds of medication use for low-income subsidy versus non-low-income subsidy patients and for patients from various dialysis organizations, and we report per-member-per-month and average out-of-pocket costs.

resultsPhosphate binders (∼83%) and intravenous vitamin D (77.5%-79.3%) were the most commonly used CKD-MBD medications in 2007 through 2010. The adjusted odds of prescription phosphate-binder, intravenous vitamin D, and cinacalcet use were significantly higher for low-income subsidy than for non-low-income subsidy patients. Total Part D versus CKD-MBD Part D medication costs increased 22% versus 36% from 2007 to 2010. For Part D-enrolled dialysis patients, CKD-MBD medications represented ∼50% of overall net Part D costs in 2010. LIMITATIONS: Inability to describe utilization and costs of calcium carbonate, an over-the-counter agent not covered under Medicare Part D; inability to reliably identify prescriptions filled through a non-Part D reimbursement or payment mechanism; findings may not apply to dialysis patients without Medicare Part D benefits or with Medicare Advantage plans, or to pediatric dialysis patients; could identify only prescription drugs dispensed in the outpatient setting; inability to adjust for MBD laboratory values.

conclusionsPart D net costs for CKD-MBD medications increased at a faster rate than costs for all Part D medications in dialysis patients despite relatively stable use within medication classes. In a bundled environment, there may be incentives to shift to generic phosphate binders and reduce cinacalcet use.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBone DiseasesCinacalcetDrug UtilizationFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansMaleMedicare Part DMiddle AgedNaphthalenesPhosphate-Binding ProteinsPovertyCinacalcetNaphthalenesPhosphate-Binding ProteinsVitamin DcalcimimeticsChronic kidney disease (CKD)dialysisMedicare Part Dmedication costsmineral and bone disorderphosphate bindersvitamin D analogues

Identifiers

PMID24833203
PMCPMC4209315
OpenAlexW1985305930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.