Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24832841›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2014

Cost-of-illness in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: a cross-sectional survey in Hungarian dermatological centres.

Orsolya Balogh, Valentin Brodszky, László Gulácsi, Emese Herédi, Krisztina Herszényi, Hajnalka Jókai, Sarolta Kárpáti, Petra Baji, Éva Remenyik, Andrea Szegedi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cost-of-illness studies in nine Central and Eastern European countries.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A comparison of European, Polish, Slovenian and British EQ-5D-3L value sets using a Hungarian sample of 18 chronic diseases.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Orsolya BaloghDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, 1093, Budapest, Hungary.
Valentin Brodszky
László Gulácsi
Emese Herédi
Krisztina Herszényi
Hajnalka Jókai
Sarolta Kárpáti
Petra Baji
Éva Remenyik
Andrea Szegedi
Péter Holló

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the widespread availability of biological drugs in psoriasis, there is a shortage of disease burden studies.

objectivesTo assess the cost-of-illness and quality of life of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis in Hungary.

methodsConsecutive patients with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) > 10 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) > 10, or treated with traditional systemic (TST) or biological systemic treatment (BST) were included. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, psoriasis related medication, health care utilizations and employment status in the previous 12 months were recorded. Costing was performed from the societal perspective applying the human capital approach. Quality of life was assessed using DLQI and EQ-5D measures.

resultsTwo-hundred patients were involved (females 32%) with a mean age of 51 (SD 13) years, 103 (52%) patients were on BST. Mean PASI, DLQI and EQ-5D scores were 8 (SD 10), 6 (SD 7) and 0.69 (SD 0.3), respectively. The mean total cost was €9,254/patient/year (SD 8,502) with direct costs accounting for 86%. The main cost driver was BST (mean €7,339/patient/year). Total costs differed significantly across treatment subgroups, mean (SD): no systemic therapy €2,186 (4,165), TST €2,388 (4,106) and BST €15,790 (6,016) (p < 0,001). Patients with BST had better PASI and DLQI scores (p < 0.01) than the other two subgroups.

conclusionsPatients with biological treatment have a significantly better quality of life and higher total costs than patients with or without traditional systemic treatment. Our study is the largest in Europe and the first in the CEE region that provides cost-of-illness data in psoriasis involving patients with BST.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessQuality of LifeAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAmbulatory CareBiological ProductsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMiddle AgedPsoriasisSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesBiological Products

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.