SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sentinel node biopsy for diagnosis of lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Hormone replacement therapy for women previously treated for endometrial cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- [Radiochemotherapy improves failure-free survival in stage III endometrial cancer : Final results of the PORTEC-3 trial].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017Trial
- Observational
- Evaluation of early chemotherapy response by combining static- and dynamic [EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Molecular Pharmacological Interventions for Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- Survival benefit of cytoreductive surgery in patients with primary stage IV endometrial cancer: a systematic review & meta-analysis.BJC reports · 2024Article
- Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes of Endometrial Cancer: A single institution experience.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2024Article
- Article
- MRI radiomics captures early treatment response in patient-derived organoid endometrial cancer mouse models.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Single Institute Experience with Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Endometrial Cancer.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Impact of the adjuvant management and risk factors on survival in FIGO stage 3 endometrial cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Cancer cell seeding density as a mechanism of chemotherapy resistance: a novel cancer cell density index based on IC50-Seeding Density Slope (ISDS) to assess chemosensitivity.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment in Women with Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Study.International journal of clinical practice · 2023Article
- CircWDR26 regulates endometrial carcinoma progression via miR-212-3p-mediated typing genes MSH2.European journal of medical research · 2022Article
- Expression Profile of mRNAs and miRNAs Related to the Oxidative-Stress Phenomenon in the Ishikawa Cell Line Treated Either Cisplatin or Salinomycin.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Computational approaches for discovering significant microRNAs, microRNA-mRNA regulatory pathways, and therapeutic protein targets in endometrial cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 13% of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer present with advanced stage disease (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV). The standard treatment of advanced endometrial cancer consists of cytoreductive surgery followed by radiation therapy, or chemotherapy, or both. There is currently little agreement about which adjuvant treatment is the safest and most effective.
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with radiotherapy or chemoradiation, and to determine which chemotherapy agents are most effective in women presenting with advanced endometrial cancer (FIGO stage III/IV). SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Collaborative Review Group's Trial Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 10 2013), MEDLINE and EMBASE up to November 2013. Also we searched electronic clinical trial registries for ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with radiotherapy or chemoradiation in women with FIGO stage III and IV endometrial cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors selected trials, extracted data, and assessed trials for risk of bias. Where necessary, we contacted trial investigators for relevant, unpublished data. We pooled data using the random-effects model in Review Manager (RevMan) software. MAIN
resultsWe included four multicentre RCTs involving 1269 women with primary FIGO stage III/IV endometrial cancer. We considered the trials to be at low to moderate risk of bias. All participants received primary cytoreductive surgery. Two trials, evaluating 620 women (83% stage III, 17% stage IV), compared adjuvant chemotherapy with adjuvant radiotherapy; one trial evaluating 552 women (88% stage III, 12% stage IV) compared two chemotherapy regimens (cisplatin/doxorubicin/paclitaxel (CDP) versus cisplatin/doxorubicin (CD) treatment) in women who had all undergone adjuvant radiotherapy; and one trial contributed no data.Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was longer with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with adjuvant radiotherapy (OS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.99, I² = 22%; and PFS: HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.92, I² = 0%). Sensitivity analysis using adjusted and unadjusted OS data, gave similar results. In subgroup analyses, the effects on survival in favour of chemotherapy were not different for stage III and IV, or stage IIIA and IIIC (tests for subgroup differences were not significant and I² = 0%). This evidence was of moderate quality. Data from one trial showed that women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to experience haematological and neurological adverse events and alopecia, and more likely to discontinue treatment (33/194 versus 6/202; RR 5.73, 95% CI 2.45 to 13.36), than those receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment-related deaths between the chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment arms (8/309 versus 5/311; Risk Ratio (RR) 1.67, 95% CI 0.55 to 5.00).There was no clear difference in PFS between intervention groups in the one trial that compared CDP versus CD (552 women; HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.17). We considered this evidence to be of moderate quality. Mature OS data from this trial were not yet available. Severe haematological and neurological adverse events occurred more frequently with CDP than CD.We found no trials to include of adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiation in advanced endometrial cancer; however we identified one ongoing trial of this comparison. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is moderate quality evidence that chemotherapy increases survival time after primary surgery by approximately 25% relative to radiotherapy in stage III and IV endometrial cancer. There is limited evidence that it is associated with more adverse effects. There is some uncertainty as to whether triplet regimens offer similar survival benefits over doublet regimens in the long-term. Further research is needed to determine which chemotherapy regimen(s) are the most effective and least toxic, and whether the addition of radiotherapy further improves outcomes. A large trial evaluating the benefits and risks of adjuvant chemoradiation versus chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer is ongoing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.