Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24832669›Full record

ArticleBiology2013

Parsimony and model-based analyses of indels in avian nuclear genes reveal congruent and incongruent phylogenetic signals.

Tamaki Yuri, Rebecca T Kimball, John Harshman, Rauri C K Bowie, Michael J Braun, Jena L Chojnowski, Kin-Lan Han, Shannon J Hackett, Christopher J Huddleston, William S Moore and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Accurate, scalable, and fully automated inference of species trees from raw genome assemblies using ROADIES.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomes, fossils, and the concurrent rise of modern birds and flowering plants in the Late Cretaceous.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Molecular characterization ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tamaki YuriDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. tyuri@ou.edu.
Rebecca T KimballDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. rkimball@ufl.edu.
John HarshmanPepperwood Way, San Jose, CA 95124, USA. jharshman@pacbell.net.
Rauri C K BowieMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. bowie@berkeley.edu.
Michael J BraunDepartment of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746, USA. braunm@si.edu.
Jena L ChojnowskiDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. kixs4@uga.edu.
Kin-Lan HanDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. hankin@ufl.edu.
Shannon J HackettZoology Department, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lakeshore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA. shackett@fieldmuseum.org.
Christopher J HuddlestonDepartment of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746, USA. huddlestonc@si.edu.
William S MooreDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, 5047 Gullen Mall, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. wmoore1415@gmail.com.
Sushma ReddyBiology Department, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA. sreddy6@luc.edu.
Frederick H SheldonDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
David W SteadmanDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Christopher C WittDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Edward L BraunDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. ebraun68@ufl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insertion/deletion (indel) mutations, which are represented by gaps in multiple sequence alignments, have been used to examine phylogenetic hypotheses for some time. However, most analyses combine gap data with the nucleotide sequences in which they are embedded, probably because most phylogenetic datasets include few gap characters. Here, we report analyses of 12,030 gap characters from an alignment of avian nuclear genes using maximum parsimony (MP) and a simple maximum likelihood (ML) framework. Both trees were similar, and they exhibited almost all of the strongly supported relationships in the nucleotide tree, although neither gap tree supported many relationships that have proven difficult to recover in previous studies. Moreover, independent lines of evidence typically corroborated the nucleotide topology instead of the gap topology when they disagreed, although the number of conflicting nodes with high bootstrap support was limited. Filtering to remove short indels did not substantially reduce homoplasy or reduce conflict. Combined analyses of nucleotides and gaps resulted in the nucleotide topology, but with increased support, suggesting that gap data may prove most useful when analyzed in combination with nucleotide substitutions.

Identifiers

PMID24832669
PMCPMC4009869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.