Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24832518›Full record

ArticleBiology2012

Whole Genome Sequencing and a New Bioinformatics Platform Allow for Rapid Gene Identification in D. melanogaster EMS Screens.

Michael A Gonzalez, Derek Van Booven, William Hulme, Rick H Ulloa, Rafael F Acosta Lebrigio, Jeannette Osterloh, Mary Logan, Marc Freeman, Stephan Zuchner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genes & nutrition · 2019
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Matchmaker Exchange.Current protocols in human genetics · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Rapid in vivo forward genetic approach for identifying axon death genes in Drosophila.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael A GonzalezDr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics and John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. mgonzalez15@med.miami.edu.
Derek Van BoovenDr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics and John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. dvanbooven@med.miami.edu.
William HulmeDr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics and John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. whulme@med.miami.edu.
Rick H UlloaDr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics and John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. rulloa@med.miami.edu.
Rafael F Acosta LebrigioDr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics and John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. racosta2@med.miami.edu.
Jeannette OsterlohDepartment of Neurobiology University of Massachusetts Medical School, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Worcester, MA, USA. jeannette.osterloh@umassmed.edu.
Mary LoganJungers Center for Neurosciences Research, Department of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. loganm@ohsu.edu.
Marc FreemanDepartment of Neurobiology University of Massachusetts Medical School, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Worcester, MA, USA. marc.freeman@umassmed.edu.
Stephan ZuchnerDr. John T. Macdonald Foundation Department of Human Genetics and John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. szuchner@med.miami.edu.
Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation · USUniversity of Miami · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USCenter for Neurosciences · US

Funding

GENOME STUDIES IN HEREDITARY SPASTIC PARAPLEGIA - beyond the exomeR01NS072248 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Stephan Zuchner · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Genomic Studies in Charcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseR01NS075764 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SHY, MICHAEL E., ZUCHNER, STEPHAN · 2012 to 2016
$3.0M
The Pathophysiology of CMT2A in Cell and Animal ModelsR01NS052767 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ZUCHNER, STEPHAN · 2006 to 2010
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052767NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072248NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forward genetic screens in Drosophila melanogaster using ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis are a powerful approach for identifying genes that modulate specific biological processes in an in vivo setting. The mapping of genes that contain randomly-induced point mutations has become more efficient in Drosophila thanks to the maturation and availability of many types of genetic tools. However, classic approaches to gene mapping are relatively slow and ultimately require extensive Sanger sequencing of candidate chromosomal loci. With the advent of new high-throughput sequencing techniques, it is increasingly efficient to directly re-sequence the whole genome of model organisms. This approach, in combination with traditional chromosomal mapping, has the potential to greatly simplify and accelerate mutation identification in mutants generated in EMS screens. Here we show that next-generation sequencing (NGS) is an accurate and efficient tool for high-throughput sequencing and mutation discovery in Drosophila melanogaster. As a test case, mutant strains of Drosophila that exhibited long-term survival of severed peripheral axons were identified in a forward EMS mutagenesis. All mutants were recessive and fell into a single lethal complementation group, which suggested that a single gene was responsible for the protective axon degenerative phenotype. Whole genome sequencing of these genomes identified the underlying gene ect4. To improve the process of genome wide mutation identification, we developed Genomes Management Application (GEM.app, https://genomics.med.miami.edu), a graphical online user interface to a custom query framework. Using a custom GEM.app query, we were able to identify that each mutant carried a unique non-sense mutation in the gene ect4 (dSarm), which was recently shown by Osterloh et al. to be essential for the activation of axonal degeneration. Our results demonstrate the current advantages and limitations of NGS in Drosophila and we introduce GEM.app as a simple yet powerful genomics analysis tool for the Drosophila community. At a current cost of <$1,000 per genome, NGS should thus become a standard gene discovery tool in EMS induced genetic forward screens.

Identifiers

PMID24832518
PMCPMC4009818
OpenAlexW1999085061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.