ReviewDer Orthopade2014
[Possibilities and limits of modern polyethylenes. With respect to the application profile].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biodegradable and Non-Biodegradable Biomaterials and Their Effect on Cell Differentiation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- A perspective on the clinical translation of scaffolds for tissue engineering.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPolyethylene is still one of the most important materials in the field of hip and knee arthroplasty. The clinical results of the last decades have helped to further develop polyethylene into a high-tech material. Progress in the development of new materials must be compared with the tried and tested ones to provide optimal and most individual patient care.
objectivesThis article gives an overview of the history and current application profile of the material ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in hip and knee arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND
methodsWith the aid of the current literature, new developments in the field of the material UHMWPE, also with respect to the biological activity of wear, the particular biomechanics of the knee joint as well as alternative hard-hard bearing surfaces in the hip, are represented in terms of implant safety.
resultsThe problems concerning polyethylene are now well recognized. The disadvantages of the material UHMWPE could be consistently reduced based on material research so that modern polyethylenes have gradually been shown in clinical trials that they can be reliably used.
conclusionDespite this the potential for improvement has still not yet been fully exploited. Any further development must be extensively tested both biomechanically and biologically before the material can be used in vivo. Long-term results are still necessary before a material can be accepted as being clinically safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.