Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24832366›Full record

SynthesisBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2014

Oral antihypertensive therapy for severe hypertension in pregnancy and postpartum: a systematic review.

T Firoz, L A Magee, K MacDonell, B A Payne, R Gordon, M Vidler, P von Dadelszen, Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) Working Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Eclampsia: A Critical Pregnancy Complication Demanding Enhanced Maternal Care: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Does the Oral Microbiome Play a Role in Hypertensive Pregnancies?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Critical Care in Obstetrics: Where are We.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

T FirozDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
L A Magee
K MacDonell
B A Payne
R Gordon
M Vidler
P von Dadelszen
Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) Working Group
Child and Family Research Institute · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CACollege of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant and postpartum women with severe hypertension are at increased risk of stroke and require blood pressure (BP) reduction. Parenteral antihypertensives have been most commonly studied, but oral agents would be ideal for use in busy and resource-constrained settings.

objectivesTo review systematically, the effectiveness of oral antihypertensive agents for treatment of severe pregnancy/postpartum hypertension. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library was performed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in pregnancy and postpartum with at least one arm consisting of a single oral antihypertensive agent to treat systolic BP ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 110 mmHg. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Cochrane RevMan 5.1 was used to calculate relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference by random effects. MAIN

resultsWe identified 15 randomised controlled trials (915 women) in pregnancy and one postpartum trial. Most trials in pregnancy compared oral/sublingual nifedipine capsules (8-10 mg) with another agent, usually parenteral hydralazine or labetalol. Nifedipine achieved treatment success in most women, similar to hydralazine (84% with nifedipine; relative risk [RR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.98-1.17) or labetalol (100% with nifedipine; RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95-1.09). Less than 2% of women treated with nifedipine experienced hypotension. There were no differences in adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. Target BP was achieved ~ 50% of the time with oral labetalol (100 mg) or methyldopa (250 mg) (47% labetelol versus 56% methyldopa; RR 0.85 95% CI 0.54-1.33).

conclusionsOral nifedipine, and possibly labetalol and methyldopa, are suitable options for treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy/postpartum.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAntihypertensive AgentsFemaleHumansHydralazineHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedLabetalolMethyldopaNifedipinePostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeVasodilator AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsHydralazineLabetalolMethyldopaNifedipineVasodilator AgentsAntihypertensive therapyhypertensive disorders of pregnancyoral agentspregnancysevere hypertension

Identifiers

PMID24832366
PMCPMC4282072
OpenAlexW1978724044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.