Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24832132›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Meiotic drive impacts expression and evolution of x-linked genes in stalk-eyed flies.

Josephine A Reinhardt, Cara L Brand, Kimberly A Paczolt, Philip M Johns, Richard H Baker, Gerald S Wilkinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The metabolic costs of meiotic drive.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Supergene potential of a selfish centromere.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Viral discovery and diversity in trypanosomatid protozoa with a focus on relatives of the human parasiteProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Josephine A ReinhardtDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Cara L BrandDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America; Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Kimberly A PaczoltDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Philip M JohnsBard College, Annadale-on-Hudson, New York, United States of America.
Richard H BakerSackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States of America.
Gerald S WilkinsonDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
University of Maryland, College Park · USAmerican Museum of Natural History · USBard College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although sex chromosome meiotic drive has been observed in a variety of species for over 50 years, the genes causing drive are only known in a few cases, and none of these cases cause distorted sex-ratios in nature. In stalk-eyed flies (Teleopsis dalmanni), driving X chromosomes are commonly found at frequencies approaching 30% in the wild, but the genetic basis of drive has remained elusive due to reduced recombination between driving and non-driving X chromosomes. Here, we used RNAseq to identify transcripts that are differentially expressed between males carrying either a driving X (XSR) or a standard X chromosome (XST), and found hundreds of these, the majority of which are X-linked. Drive-associated transcripts show increased levels of sequence divergence (dN/dS) compared to a control set, and are predominantly expressed either in testes or in the gonads of both sexes. Finally, we confirmed that XSR and XST are highly divergent by estimating sequence differentiation between the RNAseq pools. We found that X-linked transcripts were often strongly differentiated (whereas most autosomal transcripts were not), supporting the presence of a relatively large region of recombination suppression on XSR presumably caused by one or more inversions. We have identified a group of genes that are good candidates for further study into the causes and consequences of sex-chromosome drive, and demonstrated that meiotic drive has had a profound effect on sequence evolution and gene expression of X-linked genes in this species.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsDipteraFemaleGenes, X-LinkedHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleMeiosisSex ChromosomesSex RatioX Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID24832132
PMCPMC4022487
OpenAlexW2014492766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.