Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24832078›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2014

Caged protein nanoparticles for drug delivery.

Nicholas M Molino, Szu-Wen Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Cavity acidification limits ferritin iron biomineralization.Journal of inorganic biochemistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Antibody-Nanoparticle Conjugates in Therapy: Combining the Best of Two Worlds.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholas M MolinoDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, 916 Engineering Tower, Irvine, CA 92697-2575, United States.
Szu-Wen WangDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of California, 916 Engineering Tower, Irvine, CA 92697-2575, United States. Electronic address: wangsw@uci.edu.

Funding

Multifunctional Protein Nanocapsules for Targeted DeliveryR21EB010161 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI WANG, SZU-WEN · 2010 to 2011
$375k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB010161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caged protein nanoparticles possess many desirable features for drug delivery, such as ideal sizes for endocytosis, non-toxic biodegradability, and the ability to functionalize at three distinct interfaces (external, internal, and inter-subunit) using the tools of protein engineering. Researchers have harnessed these attributes by covalently and non-covalently loading therapeutic molecules through mechanisms that facilitate release within specific microenvironments. Effective delivery depends on several factors, including specific targeting, cell uptake, release kinetics, and systemic clearance. The innate ability of the immune system to recognize and respond to proteins has recently been exploited to deliver therapeutic compounds with these platforms for immunomodulation. The diversity of drugs, loading/release mechanisms, therapeutic targets, and therapeutic efficacy are discussed in this review.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug CarriersEndocytosisHumansNanoparticlesNeoplasmsPharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug CarriersPharmaceutical PreparationsProteins

Identifiers

PMID24832078
PMCPMC4087095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.