Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24831596›Full record

Trial reportAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2014

Flow diversion versus traditional endovascular coiling therapy: design of the prospective LARGE aneurysm randomized trial.

A S Turk, R H Martin, D Fiorella, J Mocco, A Siddiqui, A Bonafe

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A S TurkFrom the Department of Radiology (A.S.T., R.H.M.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina turk@musc.edu.
R H MartinFrom the Department of Radiology (A.S.T., R.H.M.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
D FiorellaDepartment of Neurological Surgery (D.F.), Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York.
J MoccoDepartment of Neurological Surgery (J.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
A SiddiquiDepartment of Neurosurgery (A.S.), University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
A BonafeDepartment of Neurosurgery (A.B.), Hospital Gui de Chauliac, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Medical University of South Carolina · USNeurological Surgery · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Micro-Radiographic Imager for Neuroovascular InterventionsR01EB002873 · NIBIB · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI RUDIN, STEPHEN · 2003 to 2015
$5.6M
Hemodynamic Induction of Pathologic Remodeling Leading to Intracranial AneurysmsR01NS064592 · NINDS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MENG, HUI · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS 5 R01EB002873-07NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002873NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS064592-01A1NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe goal of aneurysm treatment is occlusion of an aneurysm without morbidity or mortality. Using well-established, traditional endovascular techniques, this is generally achievable with a high level of safety and efficacy. These techniques involve either constructive treatment of the aneurysm (coils with or without an intravascular stent) or deconstruction (coil occlusion) of the aneurysm and the parent artery. While established as safe and efficacious, the constructive treatment of large and giant aneurysms with coils has typically been associated with relatively lower rates of complete occlusion and higher rates of recurrence. Parent artery deconstruction, though immediately efficacious in achieving complete and durable occlusion, does require occlusion of a major intracranial blood vessel and is associated with risk of stroke. MATERIALS AND

methodsFlow diversion represents a new technology that can be used to constructively treat large and giant aneurysms. Once excluded successfully, the vessel reconstruction and aneurysm occlusion appears durable. The ability to definitively reconstruct cerebral blood vessels is an attractive approach to these large and giant complex aneurysms and allows the treatment of some aneurysms which were previously not amenable to other therapies. By comparison, conventional coiling techniques have traditionally been used for endovascular treatment of large aneurysms. Large and giant aneurysms that are amenable to either flow diversion or traditional endovascular treatment will be randomized to either therapy with FDA (or appropriate regulatory body) approved devices.

resultsThe trial is currently enrolling and results of the data are pending the completion of enrollment and follow-up.

conclusionsThis paper details the trial design of the LARGE trial, a blinded, prospective randomized trial of large anterior circulation aneurysms amenable to either traditional endovascular treatments using coils or reconstruction with flow diverters.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Vessel ProsthesisCerebral RevascularizationEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceResearch DesignRisk FactorsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID24831596
PMCPMC7966601
OpenAlexW2153535872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.