Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24831101›Full record

ArticleBioconjugate chemistry2014

Understanding protein-nanoparticle interaction: a new gateway to disease therapeutics.

Karuna Giri, Khader Shameer, Michael T Zimmermann, Sounik Saha, Prabir K Chakraborty, Anirudh Sharma, Rochelle R Arvizo, Benjamin J Madden, Daniel J Mccormick, Jean-Pierre A Kocher and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioconjugate chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CAP superfamily proteins in human: a new target for cancer therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024
    Review
  5. Nanoparticle-assisted tubulin assembly is environment dependent.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gold Nanoparticles Contact with Cancer Cell: A Brief Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Revealing macropinocytosis using nanoparticles.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Gold Nanoparticles Augment N-Terminal Cleavage and Splicing Reactions inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Ubiquitin-binding associated protein 2 regulates KRAS activation and macropinocytosis in pancreatic cancer.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karuna GiriDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ‡Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, ⊥Molecular Medicine Program, and #Proteomics Research Center, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States.
Khader Shameer
Michael T Zimmermann
Sounik Saha
Prabir K Chakraborty
Anirudh Sharma
Rochelle R Arvizo
Benjamin J Madden
Daniel J Mccormick
Jean-Pierre A Kocher
Resham Bhattacharya
Priyabrata Mukherjee
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Molecular Mechanism of Antiangiogenic Properties of Gold NanoparticleR01CA136494 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MUKHERJEE, PRIYABRATA · 2009 to 2020
$2.9M
Development of a gold nanoparticles based targeted delivery systemR01CA135011 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MUKHERJEE, PRIYABRATA · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA135011NCI NIH HHS CA136494NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS R01 CA135011NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular identification of protein molecules surrounding nanoparticles (NPs) may provide useful information that influences NP clearance, biodistribution, and toxicity. Hence, nanoproteomics provides specific information about the environment that NPs interact with and can therefore report on the changes in protein distribution that occurs during tumorigenesis. Therefore, we hypothesized that characterization and identification of protein molecules that interact with 20 nm AuNPs from cancer and noncancer cells may provide mechanistic insights into the biology of tumor growth and metastasis and identify new therapeutic targets in ovarian cancer. Hence, in the present study, we systematically examined the interaction of the protein molecules with 20 nm AuNPs from cancer and noncancerous cell lysates. Time-resolved proteomic profiles of NP-protein complexes demonstrated electrostatic interaction to be the governing factor in the initial time-points which are dominated by further stabilization interaction at longer time-points as determined by ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-vis), dynamic light scattering (DLS), ζ-potential measurements, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Reduction in size, charge, and number of bound proteins were observed as the protein-NP complex stabilized over time. Interestingly, proteins related to mRNA processing were overwhelmingly represented on the NP-protein complex at all times. More importantly, comparative proteomic analyses revealed enrichment of a number of cancer-specific proteins on the AuNP surface. Network analyses of these proteins highlighted important hub nodes that could potentially be targeted for maximal therapeutic advantage in the treatment of ovarian cancer. The importance of this methodology and the biological significance of the network proteins were validated by a functional study of three hubs that exhibited variable connectivity, namely, PPA1, SMNDC1, and PI15. Western blot analysis revealed overexpression of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells when compared to normal cells. Silencing of PPA1, SMNDC1, and PI15 by the siRNA approach significantly inhibited proliferation of ovarian cancer cells and the effect correlated with the connectivity pattern obtained from our network analyses.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell ProliferationComputational BiologyDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleGoldHumansMetal NanoparticlesModels, MolecularNeoplasm ProteinsOvarian NeoplasmsParticle SizeProteomicsStructure-Activity RelationshipSurface PropertiesAntineoplastic AgentsGoldNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24831101
PMCPMC4128259
OpenAlexW2333767757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.