Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24831043›Full record

Trial reportCancer nursing

A pilot randomized controlled trial testing a minimal intervention to prepare breast cancer survivors for recovery.

Katherine Regan Sterba, Kent Armeson, Regina Franco, Jennifer Harper, Rebecca Patten, Stacey Kindall, James Bearden, Jane Zapka

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effect of Psychological Intervention on Fear of Cancer Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine Regan SterbaAuthor Affiliations: Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Drs Sterba and Zapka, Mr Armeson, and Ms Patten); Greenville Health System Cancer Institute (Ms Franco); Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Harper); Gibbs Cancer Center, Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System, South Carolina (Ms Kindall and Dr Bearden).
Kent Armeson
Regina Franco
Jennifer Harper
Rebecca Patten
Stacey Kindall
James Bearden
Jane Zapka

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions addressing cancer survivors' posttreatment concerns can be time-intensive and require specialized staff. Research is needed to identify feasible minimal intervention strategies to improve survivors' quality of life after treatment.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and short-term impact of a minimal clinic intervention on breast cancer survivors' quality of life, unmet needs, distress, and cancer worry. INTERVENTIONS/

methodsIn this randomized controlled pilot trial, we enrolled breast cancer survivors at the end of treatment and administered baseline surveys. Participants were randomized to study arm (4-week video plus educational booklet intervention group and usual care group) and completed follow-up surveys at 10 weeks. Linear regression was used to examine intervention effects on quality of life outcomes controlling for clinical and demographic factors. Open-ended questions were used to examine program satisfaction and obtain feedback to improve the intervention.

resultsWe enrolled 92 survivors in the trial. Participants rated the intervention highly and reported feeling less isolated and having more realistic expectations about their recovery after completing the program. Despite positive qualitative findings, no significant intervention effects were observed for quality of life, unmet needs, distress, or cancer worry in unadjusted or adjusted analyses.

conclusionsFuture research is needed to define optimal intervention elements to prepare breast cancer survivors for the posttreatment period. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Effective survivorship interventions may require more intensive components such as clinical input and longer follow-up periods.

Indexed as

AnxietyBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID24831043
PMCPMC4530785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.