Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24830938›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Protein-protein interface detection using the energy centrality relationship (ECR) characteristic of proteins.

Sanjana Sudarshan, Sasi B Kodathala, Amruta C Mahadik, Isha Mehta, Brian W Beck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanjana SudarshanDepartment of Biology, Texas Woman's University, Denton, Texas, United States of America.
Sasi B KodathalaDepartment of Biology, Texas Woman's University, Denton, Texas, United States of America.
Amruta C MahadikDepartment of Biology, Texas Woman's University, Denton, Texas, United States of America.
Isha MehtaDepartment of Biology, Texas Woman's University, Denton, Texas, United States of America.
Brian W BeckDepartment of Biology, Texas Woman's University, Denton, Texas, United States of America; Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Texas Woman's University, Denton, Texas, United States of America; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Woman's University, Denton, Texas, United States of America.
Texas Woman's University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific protein interactions are responsible for most biological functions. Distinguishing Functionally Linked Interfaces of Proteins (FLIPs), from Functionally uncorrelated Contacts (FunCs), is therefore important to characterizing these interactions. To achieve this goal, we have created a database of protein structures called FLIPdb, containing proteins belonging to various functional sub-categories. Here, we use geometric features coupled with Kortemme and Baker's computational alanine scanning method to calculate the energetic sensitivity of each amino acid at the interface to substitution, identify hotspots, and identify other factors that may contribute towards an interface being FLIP or FunC. Using Principal Component Analysis and K-means clustering on a training set of 160 interfaces, we could distinguish FLIPs from FunCs with an accuracy of 76%. When these methods were applied to two test sets of 18 and 170 interfaces, we achieved similar accuracies of 78% and 80%. We have identified that FLIP interfaces have a stronger central organizing tendency than FunCs, due, we suggest, to greater specificity. We also observe that certain functional sub-categories, such as enzymes, antibody-heavy-light, antibody-antigen, and enzyme-inhibitors form distinct sub-clusters. The antibody-antigen and enzyme-inhibitors interfaces have patterns of physical characteristics similar to those of FunCs, which is in agreement with the fact that the selection pressures of these interfaces is differently evolutionarily driven. As such, our ECR model also successfully describes the impact of evolution and natural selection on protein-protein interfaces. Finally, we indicate how our ECR method may be of use in reducing the false positive rate of docking calculations.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinAlanineAnimalsBinding SitesCattleCluster AnalysisModels, MolecularModels, StatisticalPrincipal Component AnalysisProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MappingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteinsRabbitsReproducibility of ResultsAlanineProteins

Identifiers

PMID24830938
PMCPMC4022497
OpenAlexW1993232393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.