Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24830652›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2014

Towards structural systems pharmacology to study complex diseases and personalized medicine.

Lei Xie, Xiaoxia Ge, Hepan Tan, Li Xie, Yinliang Zhang, Thomas Hart, Xiaowei Yang, Philip E Bourne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanisms of Functional Pleiotropy of p73 in Cancer and Beyond.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Modeling for Drug Discovery.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. REDESIGN: RDF-based Differential Signaling Framework for Precision Medicine Analytics.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Envisioning the future of 'big data' biomedicine.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017
    Article
  15. Harnessing Big Data for Systems Pharmacology.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lei XieDepartment of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America; Ph.D. Program in Computer Science, Biology, and Biochemistry, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America.
Xiaoxia GeDepartment of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America.
Hepan TanDepartment of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America.
Li XieSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Yinliang ZhangSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Thomas HartDepartment of Biological Sciences, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America.
Xiaowei YangSchool of Public Health, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America.
Philip E BourneSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.

Funding

Structural Bioinformatics, Systems Pharmacology and Scholarly CommunicationZIALM000928 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI BOURNE, PHILIP · 2015 to 2016
$1.3M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS), whole genome sequencing, and high-throughput omics techniques have generated vast amounts of genotypic and molecular phenotypic data. However, these data have not yet been fully explored to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of drug discovery, which continues along a one-drug-one-target-one-disease paradigm. As a partial consequence, both the cost to launch a new drug and the attrition rate are increasing. Systems pharmacology and pharmacogenomics are emerging to exploit the available data and potentially reverse this trend, but, as we argue here, more is needed. To understand the impact of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors on drug action, we must study the structural energetics and dynamics of molecular interactions in the context of the whole human genome and interactome. Such an approach requires an integrative modeling framework for drug action that leverages advances in data-driven statistical modeling and mechanism-based multiscale modeling and transforms heterogeneous data from GWAS, high-throughput sequencing, structural genomics, functional genomics, and chemical genomics into unified knowledge. This is not a small task, but, as reviewed here, progress is being made towards the final goal of personalized medicines for the treatment of complex diseases.

Indexed as

Drug DesignSystems TheoryGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPharmacogeneticsPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID24830652
PMCPMC4022462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.