Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24830502›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Genes that bias Mendelian segregation.

Pierre Grognet, Hervé Lalucque, Fabienne Malagnac, Philippe Silar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Oocyte Kinetochores at the Nexus of Meiotic Drive and Segregation Fidelity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Evolutionary persistence and divergence of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An egg sabotaging mechanism drives non-Mendelian transmission in mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proliferation and dissemination of killer meiotic drive loci.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Enforcement of Postzygotic Species Boundaries in the Fungal Kingdom.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. TheeLife · 2022
    Article
  20. Non-Mendelian transmission of accessory chromosomes in fungi.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre GrognetUniv Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut des Energies de Demain, Paris, France; Univ Paris Sud, Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Bât. 400, Orsay, France.
Hervé LalucqueUniv Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut des Energies de Demain, Paris, France; Univ Paris Sud, Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Bât. 400, Orsay, France.
Fabienne MalagnacUniv Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut des Energies de Demain, Paris, France; Univ Paris Sud, Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Bât. 400, Orsay, France.
Philippe SilarUniv Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut des Energies de Demain, Paris, France; Univ Paris Sud, Institut de Génétique et Microbiologie, Bât. 400, Orsay, France.
Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Énergies de Demain · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mendel laws of inheritance can be cheated by Meiotic Drive Elements (MDs), complex nuclear genetic loci found in various eukaryotic genomes and distorting segregation in their favor. Here, we identify and characterize in the model fungus Podospora anserina Spok1 and Spok2, two MDs known as Spore Killers. We show that they are related genes with both spore-killing distorter and spore-protecting responder activities carried out by the same allele. These alleles act as autonomous elements, exert their effects independently of their location in the genome and can act as MDs in other fungi. Additionally, Spok1 acts as a resistance factor to Spok2 killing. Genetical data and cytological analysis of Spok1 and Spok2 localization during the killing process suggest a complex mode of action for Spok proteins. Spok1 and Spok2 belong to a multigene family prevalent in the genomes of many ascomycetes. As they have no obvious cellular role, Spok1 and Spok2 Spore Killer genes represent a novel kind of selfish genetic elements prevalent in fungal genome that proliferate through meiotic distortion.

Indexed as

AllelesChromosome SegregationCrosses, GeneticFungal ProteinsMeiosisPodosporaSpores, FungalFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24830502
PMCPMC4022471
OpenAlexW1971416593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.