Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24830426›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

The structural analysis of shark IgNAR antibodies reveals evolutionary principles of immunoglobulins.

Matthias J Feige, Melissa A Gräwert, Moritz Marcinowski, Janosch Hennig, Julia Behnke, David Ausländer, Eva M Herold, Jirka Peschek, Caitlin D Castro, Martin Flajnik and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Characteristics and Genomic Localization of Nurse Shark (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Special focus issue: passive immunization.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias J FeigeDepartment of Tumor Cell Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105; matthias.feige@stjude.org.
Melissa A GräwertCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany;
Moritz MarcinowskiCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany;
Janosch HennigCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany;Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; and.
Julia BehnkeDepartment of Tumor Cell Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105;
David AusländerCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany;
Eva M HeroldCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany;
Jirka PeschekCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany;
Caitlin D CastroDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Martin FlajnikDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Linda M HendershotDepartment of Tumor Cell Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105;
Michael SattlerCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany;Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; and.
Michael GrollCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany;
Johannes BuchnerCenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany;
Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DESt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Role of Molecular Chaperones in Ig Biosynthesis 11-2008R01GM054068 · NIGMS · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI HENDERSHOT, LINDA M · 1996 to 2018
$5.7M
Evolution of Adaptive ImmunityR01OD010549 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI FLAJNIK, MARTIN F · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS Y1-CO-1020NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054068NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM54068NIGMS NIH HHS Y1-GM-1104NIH HHS R01 OD010549NIH HHS R01 OD010549-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharks and other cartilaginous fish are the phylogenetically oldest living organisms that rely on antibodies as part of their adaptive immune system. They produce the immunoglobulin new antigen receptor (IgNAR), a homodimeric heavy chain-only antibody, as a major part of their humoral adaptive immune response. Here, we report the atomic resolution structure of the IgNAR constant domains and a structural model of this heavy chain-only antibody. We find that despite low sequence conservation, the basic Ig fold of modern antibodies is already present in the evolutionary ancient shark IgNAR domains, highlighting key structural determinants of the ubiquitous Ig fold. In contrast, structural differences between human and shark antibody domains explain the high stability of several IgNAR domains and allowed us to engineer human antibodies for increased stability and secretion efficiency. We identified two constant domains, C1 and C3, that act as dimerization modules within IgNAR. Together with the individual domain structures and small-angle X-ray scattering, this allowed us to develop a structural model of the complete IgNAR molecule. Its constant region exhibits an elongated shape with flexibility and a characteristic kink in the middle. Despite the lack of a canonical hinge region, the variable domains are spaced appropriately wide for binding to multiple antigens. Thus, the shark IgNAR domains already display the well-known Ig fold, but apart from that, this heavy chain-only antibody employs unique ways for dimerization and positioning of functional modules.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAdaptive ImmunityAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodiesCells, CulturedHumansImmunoglobulin Constant RegionsImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsInsectaMolecular Sequence DataOsmoregulationProtein EngineeringProtein FoldingProtein StabilityProtein Structure, TertiaryAntibodiesImmunoglobulin Constant RegionsImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsReceptors, AntigenUreaantibody structureprotein engineeringprotein evolutionprotein folding

Identifiers

PMID24830426
PMCPMC4050542
OpenAlexW2083986573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.