Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24830394›Full record

SynthesisPLoS genetics2014

Bayesian test for colocalisation between pairs of genetic association studies using summary statistics.

Claudia Giambartolomei, Damjan Vukcevic, Eric E Schadt, Lude Franke, Aroon D Hingorani, Chris Wallace, Vincent Plagnol

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2,782 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,782citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
34.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,782 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4,336 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2,722 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Claudia GiambartolomeiUCL Genetics Institute, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
Damjan VukcevicMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Eric E SchadtDepartment of Genetics and Genomics Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Lude FrankeDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Aroon D HingoraniInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Chris WallaceJDRF/Wellcome Trust Diabetes and Inflammation Laboratory, Cambridge, Institute for Medical Research, Department of Medical Genetics, NIHR, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Vincent PlagnolUCL Genetics Institute, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

British Heart FoundationMedical Research Council G1001158Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1Wellcome Trust 089989Wellcome Trust 091157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic association studies, in particular the genome-wide association study (GWAS) design, have provided a wealth of novel insights into the aetiology of a wide range of human diseases and traits, in particular cardiovascular diseases and lipid biomarkers. The next challenge consists of understanding the molecular basis of these associations. The integration of multiple association datasets, including gene expression datasets, can contribute to this goal. We have developed a novel statistical methodology to assess whether two association signals are consistent with a shared causal variant. An application is the integration of disease scans with expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) studies, but any pair of GWAS datasets can be integrated in this framework. We demonstrate the value of the approach by re-analysing a gene expression dataset in 966 liver samples with a published meta-analysis of lipid traits including >100,000 individuals of European ancestry. Combining all lipid biomarkers, our re-analysis supported 26 out of 38 reported colocalisation results with eQTLs and identified 14 new colocalisation results, hence highlighting the value of a formal statistical test. In three cases of reported eQTL-lipid pairs (SYPL2, IFT172, TBKBP1) for which our analysis suggests that the eQTL pattern is not consistent with the lipid association, we identify alternative colocalisation results with SORT1, GCKR, and KPNB1, indicating that these genes are more likely to be causal in these genomic intervals. A key feature of the method is the ability to derive the output statistics from single SNP summary statistics, hence making it possible to perform systematic meta-analysis type comparisons across multiple GWAS datasets (implemented online at http://coloc.cs.ucl.ac.uk/coloc/). Our methodology provides information about candidate causal genes in associated intervals and has direct implications for the understanding of complex diseases as well as the design of drugs to target disease pathways.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansSample Size

Identifiers

PMID24830394
PMCPMC4022491
OpenAlexW2073836327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.