Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24829756›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2013

Immunologic responses to xenogeneic tyrosinase DNA vaccine administered by electroporation in patients with malignant melanoma.

Jianda Yuan, Geoffrey Y Ku, Matthew Adamow, Zhenyu Mu, Sapna Tandon, Drew Hannaman, Paul Chapman, Gary Schwartz, Richard Carvajal, Katherine S Panageas and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00471133 (A Phase Ia/Ib Study of the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Xenogeneic Tyrosinase DNA Vaccine Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00471133 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase Ia/Ib Study of the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Xenogeneic Tyrosinase DNA Vaccine Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorIchor Medical Systems IncorporatedRan2007 to 2010Enrolled24ConditionsMelanoma (Skin), Intraocular MelanomaArmsXenogeneic Tyrosinase DNA Vaccine, TriGrid Delivery System for Intramuscular Electroporation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cancer vaccines: current status and future directions.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Quantitative Expression ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Cancer DNA vaccines: current preclinical and clinical developments and future perspectives.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianda Yuan *Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Immunology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York NY10065, USA.
Geoffrey Y Ku *Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Matthew AdamowLudwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Immunology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York NY10065, USA.
Zhenyu MuLudwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Immunology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York NY10065, USA.
Sapna TandonLudwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Immunology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York NY10065, USA.
Drew HannamanIchor Medical System, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Paul ChapmanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Gary SchwartzDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Richard CarvajalDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Katherine S PanageasDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY10065, USA.
Alan N HoughtonLudwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Immunology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York NY10065, USA.
Jedd D WolchokLudwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Immunology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York NY10065, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USKettering University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies show that intramuscular injection and particle-mediated epidermal delivery of xenogeneic melanosomal antigens (tyrosinase or Tyr, gp100) induce CD8(+) T cell responses to the syngeneic protein. To further define the optimal vaccination strategy, we conducted a phase I study of in vivo electroporation (EP) of a murine Tyr DNA vaccine (pINGmuTyr) in malignant melanoma patients.

methodsHuman leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A1, A2, A24 or B35 stage IIb-IV melanoma patients received up to five doses of the mouse tyrosinase DNA vaccine by EP every three weeks at dose levels of 0.2 mg, 0.5 mg, or 1.5 mg per injection. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected, cultured with a peptide pool containing eight HLA class I-restricted Tyr-specific T-cell epitopes, and analyzed by HLA-A*0101-restricted tetramers and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS).

resultsTwenty-four patients received ≥1 dose of the pINGmuTyr vaccine; PBMCs from 21 patients who completed all five doses were available for Tyr immune assays. The only common toxicity was grade 1 injection site reaction. Six of 15 patients (40%) in the 1.5 mg dose cohort developed Tyr-reactive CD8(+) T cell responses following stimulation, defined as a ≥3 standard deviation increase in baseline reactivity by tetramer or ICS assays. No Tyr-reactive CD8(+) T cell response was detected in the 0.2 mg and 0.5 mg dose cohort patients. Epitope spreading of CD8(+) T cell response to NY-ESO-1 was observed in one patient with vitiligo. One patient subsequently received ipilimumab and developed an enhanced Tyr-reactive response with polyfunctional cytokine profile. After a median follow-up of 40.9 months, median survival has not been reached.

conclusionsA regimen of five immunizations with pINGmuTyr administered by EP was found to be safe and resulted in Tyr-reactive immune responses in six of 15 patients at 1.5 mg dose cohort.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00471133.

Indexed as

DNA vaccineElectroporationEpitope spreadingImmune responseMelanoma patientTyrosinase

Identifiers

PMID24829756
PMCPMC4019903
OpenAlexW2102563241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.