ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2013
Immunologic responses to xenogeneic tyrosinase DNA vaccine administered by electroporation in patients with malignant melanoma.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00471133 (A Phase Ia/Ib Study of the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Xenogeneic Tyrosinase DNA Vaccine Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase Ia/Ib Study of the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Xenogeneic Tyrosinase DNA Vaccine Melanoma
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomaterial-Integrated Electroporation for Therapeutic Delivery: From Gene Editing to Tumor Ablation and Immune Modulation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Leveraging Dog Models to Uncover Human Cancer Insights.Research square · 2026Article
- Vaccines as treatment for melanoma: an update review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic melanoma vaccines: Platforms, neoantigen strategies, and emerging combination immunotherapies.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2026Review
- Review
- Advances and Challenges in Immunotherapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Clinical Strategies and Emerging Targets.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Current Therapies and Potential Strategies for Uveal Melanoma.Drugs and drug candidates · 2025Article
- Immunoprevention of non-viral cancers: challenges and strategies for early intervention.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Cancer vaccines: current status and future directions.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- APAVAC Immunotherapy for the Adjuvant Treatment of a Canine Mucosal Melanoma.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Exosome-based immunotherapy as an innovative therapeutic approach in melanoma.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
- Review of Role of Surgery with Electroporation in Melanoma: Chemotherapy, Immunotherapy, and Gene Delivery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Anti-tumor activity of intratumoral xenogeneic urothelial cell monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in syngeneic murine models of bladder cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Advances of Electroporation-Related Therapies and the Synergy with Immunotherapy in Cancer Treatment.Vaccines · 2022Review
- Electrochemotherapy and Other Clinical Applications of Electroporation for the Targeted Therapy of Metastatic Melanoma.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Quantitative Expression ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Comparison of DNA and mRNA vaccines against cancer.Drug discovery today · 2020Review
- Naturally occurring cancers in pet dogs as pre-clinical models for cancer immunotherapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2019Review
- Cancer DNA vaccines: current preclinical and clinical developments and future perspectives.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrior studies show that intramuscular injection and particle-mediated epidermal delivery of xenogeneic melanosomal antigens (tyrosinase or Tyr, gp100) induce CD8(+) T cell responses to the syngeneic protein. To further define the optimal vaccination strategy, we conducted a phase I study of in vivo electroporation (EP) of a murine Tyr DNA vaccine (pINGmuTyr) in malignant melanoma patients.
methodsHuman leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A1, A2, A24 or B35 stage IIb-IV melanoma patients received up to five doses of the mouse tyrosinase DNA vaccine by EP every three weeks at dose levels of 0.2 mg, 0.5 mg, or 1.5 mg per injection. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were collected, cultured with a peptide pool containing eight HLA class I-restricted Tyr-specific T-cell epitopes, and analyzed by HLA-A*0101-restricted tetramers and intracellular cytokine staining (ICS).
resultsTwenty-four patients received ≥1 dose of the pINGmuTyr vaccine; PBMCs from 21 patients who completed all five doses were available for Tyr immune assays. The only common toxicity was grade 1 injection site reaction. Six of 15 patients (40%) in the 1.5 mg dose cohort developed Tyr-reactive CD8(+) T cell responses following stimulation, defined as a ≥3 standard deviation increase in baseline reactivity by tetramer or ICS assays. No Tyr-reactive CD8(+) T cell response was detected in the 0.2 mg and 0.5 mg dose cohort patients. Epitope spreading of CD8(+) T cell response to NY-ESO-1 was observed in one patient with vitiligo. One patient subsequently received ipilimumab and developed an enhanced Tyr-reactive response with polyfunctional cytokine profile. After a median follow-up of 40.9 months, median survival has not been reached.
conclusionsA regimen of five immunizations with pINGmuTyr administered by EP was found to be safe and resulted in Tyr-reactive immune responses in six of 15 patients at 1.5 mg dose cohort.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00471133.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.