Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24829746›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2013

A randomized pilot phase I study of modified carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) peptide (CAP1-6D)/montanide/GM-CSF-vaccine in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Daniel M Geynisman, Yuanyuan Zha, Rangesh Kunnavakkam, Mebea Aklilu, Daniel Vt Catenacci, Blase N Polite, Cara Rosenbaum, Azadeh Namakydoust, Theodore Karrison, Thomas F Gajewski and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00203892 (A Randomized Pilot Phase II Study of Immunization With Modified CEA), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00203892 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized Pilot Phase II Study of Immunization With Modified CEA (CAP1-6D) Peptide In Patients With Locally Advanced Or Surgically Resected Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ChicagoRan2003 to 2012Enrolled23ConditionsPancreatic AdenocarcinomaArmsmodified CEA peptide (10mcg), modified CEA peptide (100mcg), modified CEA peptide (1000mcg)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting Carcinoembryonic Antigen with DNA Vaccination: On-Target Adverse Events Link with Immunologic and Clinical Outcomes.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Advances in Vaccine-Based Therapies for Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Review
  10. A Brief Introduction to Current Cancer Gene Therapy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Peptide-Based Therapeutics for Oncology.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Biomarker-Based Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An Emerging Reality?Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  19. Strategies for Increasing Pancreatic Tumor Immunogenicity.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel M GeynismanSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yuanyuan ZhaUniversity of Chicago Cancer Research Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rangesh KunnavakkamDepartment of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mebea AkliluSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Daniel Vt CatenacciSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Blase N PoliteSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cara RosenbaumSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Azadeh NamakydoustSection of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Theodore KarrisonDepartment of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Thomas F Gajewski *Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hedy L Kindler *Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · USCancer Research Center · USPalmetto Hematology Oncology · US

Funding

Developing an Oncology Workforce for the 21st Century - Renewal 01K12CA139160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLOPADE, OLUFUNMILAYO F., SMITH, SONALI · 2010 to 2024
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA139160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCEA is expressed in >90% of pancreatic cancers (PC) and may be an appropriate immunotherapy target. CEA is poorly immunogenic due to immune tolerance; CAP1-6D, an altered peptide ligand can help bypass tolerance. We conducted a pilot randomized phase I trial in PC patients to determine the peptide dose required to induce an optimal CD8(+) T cell response.

methodsPatients with a PS 0-1, HLA-A2+ and CEA-expressing, previously-treated PC were randomized to receive 10 μg (arm A), 100 μg (arm B) or 1000 μg (arm C) of CEA peptide emulsified in Montanide and GM-CSF, given every 2 weeks until disease progression.

resultsSixty-six patients were screened and 19 enrolled of whom 14 received at least 3 doses of the vaccine and thus evaluated for the primary immunologic endpoint. A median of 4 cycles (range 1-81) was delivered. Median and mean peak IFN-γ T cell response by ELISPOT (spots per 10(4) CD8(+) cells, Arm A/B/C) was 11/52/271 (A vs. C, p = 0.028) for medians and 37/148/248 (A vs. C, p = 0.032) for means. T cell responses developed or increased in 20%/60%/100% of pts in Arms A/B/C. Seven of the 19 patients remain alive at a minimum 32 months from trial initiation, including three with unresectable disease.

conclusionsThe T cell response in this randomized phase I trial was dose-dependent with the 1 mg CEA peptide dose eliciting the most robust T cell responses. A signal of clinical benefit was observed and no significant toxicity was noted. Further evaluation of 1 mg CEA peptide with stronger adjuvants, and/or combined with agents to overcome immune inhibitory pathways, may be warranted in PC pts.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00203892.

Indexed as

CEAImmunizationPancreatic CancerVaccine

Identifiers

PMID24829746
PMCPMC4019890
OpenAlexW2155151533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.