ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2014
Roles of the nucleus accumbens (shell) in the acquisition and expression of morphine-induced conditioned behavior in freely moving rats.
Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe nucleus accumbens (NAc) is a part of the rewarding cortico-mesolimbic dopamine (DA) pathway. This is a heterogeneous structure divided in two sub regions termed core and shell. DA function in the NAc is critical for goal-oriented behaviors, including those motivated by drug and brain stimulation reward. In the conditioned-place preference (CPP) paradigm, a test assessing animal's ability to associate drug-induced effects with environmental cause to quantify drug reward for example morphine.
methodsIn the present study, we investigated the influence of electrical stimulation with different current intensities on (25 and 100 µA) with and without an effective dose of morphine (0.5 and 5 mg/kg) on CPP.
resultsSubcutaneous administration of morphine 5 mg/kg produced significant CPP in comparison with saline group. Our findings also showed that electrical stimulation of NAc (100 µA) significantly (P < 0.01) suppressed morphine-induced CPP that reveals impaired learning and memory formation in the process of conditioning. We found that morphine-induced CPP can be successfully suppressed by current intensity (100 µA). It was probably due to decreasing of dopamine contents and its metabolites in the NAc. Current intensity (100 µA) in combination with ineffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) increased morphine-induced CPP probability via the prove reward system.
conclusionsSince stimulation of dopaminergic neurons increases tendency to dependence to morphine, therefore in the present study, the stimulation of the NAc suppressed morphine-induced CPP that this shows impairment of learning and memory formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24829709PMC4018634W2134940349What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.