ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2014
Retroperitoneal paragangliomas: Report of 4 cases.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An incidental finding of retroperitoneal paraganglioma during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2022Article
- [Perioperative management of a retroperitoneal paraganglioma].The Pan African medical journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We reviewed the data of all patients managed for retroperitoneal paragangliomas (PGLs) between June 2010 and June 2011 to present our experience concerning this uncommon entity to highlight diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of retroperitoneal PGLs. All patients were admitted to the department of general and hepatobiliary surgery in the regional hospital of Jendouba, Tunisia. The size of the tumor was taken at its largest dimension, as determined in a computed tomography (CT) scan and pathological reports. There were 4 patients (all women) with a median age of 48 years (range 46-56 years). Abdominal pain was the commonest presentation. CT showed and localized the tumors which were all retroperitoneal. All patients had successful surgical resection of the tumors under invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring. One patient underwent surgery for a presumed tumor of the pancreatic head. The fresh-mount microscopic study of the peroperative biopsy yielded inflammatory tissue without malignancy and no resection was performed. Final histological examination of the biopsy concluded PGL. A second laparotomy was performed and the tumor was entirely resected. The diagnosis was made after surgery by histology in all patients. The control of the blood pressure was improved after surgery in 3 patients. Paragangliomas are rare tumors. The retroperitoneal localization is uncommon. Complete surgical resection remains the only curative treatment but it is often challenging as these tumors are located near multiple vital blood vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.