Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24829471›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2014

Clinical research strategies for fructose metabolism.

Maren R Laughlin, John P Bantle, Peter J Havel, Elizabeth Parks, David M Klurfeld, Karen Teff, Padma Maruvada

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Carbohydrates.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maren R LaughlinNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD maren.laughlin@nih.gov.
John P BantleDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Peter J HavelDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Department of Nutrition, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.
Elizabeth ParksDepartment of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, Institute for Clinical Translational Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; and.
David M KlurfeldUSDA, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD.
Karen TeffNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
Padma MaruvadaNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USAgricultural Research Service · USNutrition Sciences (Belgium) · BEUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fructose and simple sugars are a substantial part of the western diet, and their influence on human health remains controversial. Clinical studies in fructose nutrition have proven very difficult to conduct and interpret. NIH and USDA sponsored a workshop on 13-14 November 2012, "Research Strategies for Fructose Metabolism," to identify important scientific questions and parameters to be considered while designing clinical studies. Research is needed to ascertain whether there is an obesogenic role for fructose-containing sugars via effects on eating behavior and energy balance and whether there is a dose threshold beyond which these sugars promote progression toward diabetes and liver and cardiovascular disease, especially in susceptible populations. Studies tend to fall into 2 categories, and design criteria for each are described. Mechanistic studies are meant to validate observations made in animals or to elucidate the pathways of fructose metabolism in humans. These highly controlled studies often compare the pure monosaccharides glucose and fructose. Other studies are focused on clinically significant disease outcomes or health behaviors attributable to amounts of fructose-containing sugars typically found in the American diet. These are designed to test hypotheses generated from short-term mechanistic or epidemiologic studies and provide data for health policy. Discussion brought out the opinion that, although many mechanistic questions concerning the metabolism of monosaccharide sugars in humans remain to be addressed experimentally in small highly controlled studies, health outcomes research meant to inform health policy should use large, long-term studies using combinations of sugars found in the typical American diet rather than pure fructose or glucose.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomedical ResearchCarbohydratesCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicDietDisease Models, AnimalEnergy MetabolismFeeding BehaviorFructoseHealth BehaviorHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicMetabolic DiseasesCarbohydratesFructose

Identifiers

PMID24829471
PMCPMC4013177
OpenAlexW2147507161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.