ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2014
Physician assessments of the value of therapeutic information delivered via e-mail.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vulvodynia Viewed From a Disease Prevention Framework: Insights From Patient Perspectives.Sexual medicine · 2020Article
- The Creation of a Practice-Based Network of Pharmacists Working in Family Medicine Groups (FMG).Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Disseminating health evidence summaries to increase evidence use in health care.Revista de saude publica · 2018Article
- Enablers and determinants of the provision of written action plans to patients with asthma: a stratified survey of Canadian physicians.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2017Article
- When Educational Material Is Delivered: A Mixed Methods Content Validation Study of the Information Assessment Method.JMIR medical education · 2017Article
- Expected health benefits of e-Therapeutics Highlights according to pharmacists and physicians.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2016Article
- Advantages and disadvantages of educational email alerts for family physicians: viewpoint.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Article
- "Better-than-best" evidence? Using family physicians' feedback for 2-way knowledge translation.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2014Article
- In pursuit of a valid Information Assessment Method for continuing education: a mixed methods study.BMC medical education · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedMoscovici, Jonathan L [added]
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
problem addressedAlthough e-learning programs are popular and access to electronic knowledge resources has improved, raising awareness about updated therapeutic recommendations in practice continues to be a challenge. OBJECTIVE OF PROGRAM: To raise awareness about and document the use of therapeutic recommendations. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: In 2010, family physicians evaluated e-Therapeutics (e-T) Highlights with a Web-based tool called the Information Assessment Method (IAM). The e-T Highlights consisted of information found in the primary care reference e-Therapeutics+. Each week, family physicians received an e-mail containing a link to 1 Highlight from a different chapter of e-Therapeutics+. Family physicians received continuing medical education credits for each Highlight they rated with the IAM. Of the 5346 participants, 85% of them were full-time or part-time practitioners. A total of 31 429 Highlights ratings were received in 2010 (median of 2 ratings per participant, range 1 to 49). Among participants who rated more than 2 Highlights, the median number of ratings was 7 (mean 11.9). The relevance of the information from individual Highlights varied widely; however, for 90% of the rated Highlights participants indicated total or partial relevance of the information for at least 1 patient. For 41% of rated Highlights, participants expected patient health benefits to result from implementing the recommendation, such as avoiding an unnecessary or inappropriate treatment, or a preventive intervention.
conclusionThis continuing medical education program stimulated family physicians to rate therapeutic recommendations that were delivered weekly via e-mail. The process of rating e-T Highlights with the IAM raised awareness about treatment recommendations and documented self-reported use of this information in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24829020PMC4020663What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.