Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24829010›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2014

Diagnosis and management of dementia in primary care: exploratory study.

Jasneet Parmar, Bonnie Dobbs, Rhianne McKay, Catherine Kirwan, Tim Cooper, Alexandra Marin, Nancy Gupta

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparing Short Cognitive Screening Instruments in an Outreach Memory Clinic in Primary Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Confidence in Dementia Management and Its Associated Factors among Primary Care Doctors in Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Frontiers in dementia · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jasneet ParmarAssociate Professor, in the Division of Care of the Elderly at the University of Alberta in Edmonton. jasneet.parmar@albertahealthservices.ca.
Bonnie DobbsProfessor and Director of Research, in the Division of Care of the Elderly at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
Rhianne McKayResearch Coordinator, in the Division of Care of the Elderly at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
Catherine KirwanStudent at the University of Alberta.
Tim CooperResident at the University of Alberta.
Alexandra MarinAssistant Clinical Professor in the Division of Care of the Elderly at the University of Alberta.
Nancy GuptaInternational medical graduate and a volunteer in the Division of Care of the Elderly at the University of Alberta.
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the current identification and management of patients with dementia in a primary care setting; to determine the accuracy of identification of dementia by primary care physicians; to examine reasons (triggers) for referral of patients with suspected dementia to the geriatric assessment team (GAT) from the primary care setting; and to compare indices of identification and management of dementia between the GAT and primary care network (PCN) physicians and between the GAT and community care (CC).

designRetrospective chart review and comparisons, based on quality indicators of dementia care as specified in the Third Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia, were conducted from matching charts obtained from 3 groups of health care providers.

settingSemirural region in the province of Alberta involving a PCN, CC, and a GAT.

participantsOne hundred patients who had been assessed by the GAT randomly selected from among those diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment by the GAT.

main outcome measuresDiagnosis of dementia and indications of high-quality dementia care listed in PCN, CC, and GAT charts.

resultsOnly 59% of the patients diagnosed with dementia by the GAT had a documented diagnosis of dementia in their PCN charts. None of the 12 patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment by the GAT had been diagnosed by the PCN. Memory decline was the most common reason for referral to the GAT. There were statistically significant differences between the PCN and the GAT on all quality indicators of dementia, with underuse of diagnostic and functional assessment tools and lack of attention to wandering, driving, medicolegal, and caregiver issues, and underuse of community supports in the PCN. There was higher congruence between CC and the GAT on assessment and care indices.

conclusionDementia care remains a challenge in primary care. Within our primary care setting, there are opportunities for synergistic collaboration among the health care professionals from the PCN, CC, and the GAT. Currently they exist as individual entities in the system. An integrated model of care is required in order to build capacity to meet the needs of an aging population.

Indexed as

DementiaAgedAged, 80 and overAlbertaCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHealth Services for the AgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQuality Indicators, Health CareReferral and ConsultationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24829010
PMCPMC4020652
OpenAlexW2169222919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.