Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24828841›Full record

ReviewViruses2014

Porcine endogenous retroviruses in xenotransplantation--molecular aspects.

Magdalena C Kimsa, Barbara Strzalka-Mrozik, Malgorzata W Kimsa, Joanna Gola, Peter Nicholson, Krzysztof Lopata, Urszula Mazurek

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetically engineered porcine liver: a new era in transplantation.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Corneal xenotransplantation: Where are we standing?Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Pediatric oncofertility: an update.Translational andrology and urology · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Magdalena C KimsaDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Medical University of Silesia, Jednosci 8, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland. magdakimsa@gmail.com.
Barbara Strzalka-MrozikDepartment of Molecular Biology, Medical University of Silesia, Jednosci 8, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland. bstrzalka@sum.edu.pl.
Malgorzata W KimsaDepartment of Molecular Biology, Medical University of Silesia, Jednosci 8, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland. gosiakimsa@gmail.com.
Joanna GolaDepartment of Molecular Biology, Medical University of Silesia, Jednosci 8, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland. jgola@sum.edu.pl.
Peter NicholsonDepartment of Molecular Biology, Medical University of Silesia, Jednosci 8, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland. nicholson@wp.pl.
Krzysztof LopataDepartment of Molecular Biology, Medical University of Silesia, Jednosci 8, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland. biolmolfarm@sum.edu.pl.
Urszula MazurekDepartment of Molecular Biology, Medical University of Silesia, Jednosci 8, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland. umazurek@sum.edu.pl.
Medical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of the shortage of organs and other tissues for use in human transplantation, xenotransplantation procedures with material taken from pigs have come under increased consideration. However, there are unclear consequences of the potential transmission of porcine pathogens to humans. Of particular concern are porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). Three subtypes of PERV have been identified, of which PERV-A and PERV-B have the ability to infect human cells in vitro. The PERV-C subtype does not show this ability but recombinant PERV-A/C forms have demonstrated infectivity in human cells. In view of the risk presented by these observations, the International Xenotransplantation Association recently indicated the existence of four strategies to prevent transmission of PERVs. This article focuses on the molecular aspects of PERV infection in xenotransplantation and reviews the techniques available for the detection of PERV DNA, RNA, reverse transcriptase activity and proteins, and anti-PERV antibodies to enable carrying out these recommendations. These methods could be used to evaluate the risk of PERV transmission in human recipients, enhance the effectiveness and reliability of monitoring procedures, and stimulate discussion on the development of improved, more sensitive methods for the detection of PERVs in the future.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, ViralDNA, ViralEndogenous RetrovirusesHumansRetroviridae InfectionsRNA, ViralSwineTransplantation, HeterologousAntigens, ViralDNA, ViralRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID24828841
PMCPMC4036542
OpenAlexW2089503384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.