Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24828633›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Balanced cortical microcircuitry for spatial working memory based on corrective feedback control.

Sukbin Lim, Mark S Goldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unsupervised learning for robust working memory.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Trial-to-Trial Variability of Spiking Delay Activity in Prefrontal Cortex Constrains Burst-Coding Models of Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Poisson balanced spiking networks.PLoS computational biology · 2020
    Article
  13. Understanding the computation of time using neural network models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Competing inhibition-stabilized networks in sensory and memory processing.Conference record. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers · 2018
    Article
  19. Synaptic efficacy shapes resource limitations in working memory.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sukbin LimCenter for Neuroscience and sukbin@uchicago.edu msgoldman@ucdavis.edu.
Mark S GoldmanCenter for Neuroscience and Departments of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, and Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95618 sukbin@uchicago.edu msgoldman@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention in SchizophreniaR01MH065034 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI James M. Gold, STEVEN J LUCK · 2001 to 2026
$13.9M
Neural integration with active dendrites and inhibitionR01MH069726 · NIMH · WELLESLEY COLLEGE · PI GOLDMAN, MARK S · 2006 to 2009
$665k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065034NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hallmark of working memory is the ability to maintain graded representations of both the spatial location and amplitude of a memorized stimulus. Previous work has identified a neural correlate of spatial working memory in the persistent maintenance of spatially specific patterns of neural activity. How such activity is maintained by neocortical circuits remains unknown. Traditional models of working memory maintain analog representations of either the spatial location or the amplitude of a stimulus, but not both. Furthermore, although most previous models require local excitation and lateral inhibition to maintain spatially localized persistent activity stably, the substrate for lateral inhibitory feedback pathways is unclear. Here, we suggest an alternative model for spatial working memory that is capable of maintaining analog representations of both the spatial location and amplitude of a stimulus, and that does not rely on long-range feedback inhibition. The model consists of a functionally columnar network of recurrently connected excitatory and inhibitory neural populations. When excitation and inhibition are balanced in strength but offset in time, drifts in activity trigger spatially specific negative feedback that corrects memory decay. The resulting networks can temporally integrate inputs at any spatial location, are robust against many commonly considered perturbations in network parameters, and, when implemented in a spiking model, generate irregular neural firing characteristic of that observed experimentally during persistent activity. This work suggests balanced excitatory-inhibitory memory circuits implementing corrective negative feedback as a substrate for spatial working memory.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsCerebral CortexComputer SimulationFeedback, PhysiologicalMemory, Short-TermNerve NetNeural Inhibitionbalanced networkscomputational modeldecision makingderivative feedbackintegrationworking memory

Identifiers

PMID24828633
PMCPMC4019795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.