Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24828285›Full record

ReviewJournal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2014

Practitioner review: A critical perspective on gene-environment interaction models--what impact should they have on clinical perceptions and practice?

Marcus R Munafò, Stanley Zammit, Jonathan Flint

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tradeoffs in Modeling Context Dependency in Complex Trait Genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Parenting in the Context of the Child: Genetic and Social Processes.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · 2022
    Article
  8. The levels problem in psychopathology.Psychological medicine · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Personality as an intermediate phenotype for genetic dissection of alcohol use disorder.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Gene-Stress-Epigenetic Regulation of FKBP5: Clinical and Translational Implications.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcus R MunafòMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Stanley Zammit
Jonathan Flint
University of Bristol · GBCentre for Human Genetics · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKMedical Research Council G0801418Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/6Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychiatric disorders run in families, and early twin, family and adoption studies confirmed that this was due in part to shared genetic inheritance. While candidate gene studies largely failed to reliably identify genetic variants associated with psychiatric disorders, genome-wide association studies are beginning to do so. However, the proportion of phenotypic variance explained remains well below what would be expected from previous heritability estimates. SCOPE: We review possible reasons for this 'missing heritability', and whether incorporating gene by environment interactions into our models will substantially improve our understanding of the aetiology of psychiatric disorders, and inform clinical perceptions and practice.

findingsWe discuss potential limitations of the gene by environment interaction approach. In particular, we discuss whether these are likely to be a major contributor to psychiatric disorders at the level of the specific interaction (as opposed to at an aggregate level).

conclusionsGene by environment interaction studies offered initial promise that a far greater proportion of phenotypic variance could be explained by incorporating measures of environmental exposures into genetic studies. However, in our opinion, there are few (if any) clear examples of gene by environment interactions in psychiatry, and their scope for informing either our understanding of disease pathology or clinical practice remains limited at present.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionData Interpretation, StatisticalGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMental DisordersModels, BiologicalRisk Factorsgene × environment interactionGeneticsgenome-wide association studiesheritabilitypsychiatric disorder

Identifiers

PMID24828285
PMCPMC4961234
OpenAlexW2055245513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.