ArticlePloS one2014
Sequencing degraded DNA from non-destructively sampled museum specimens for RAD-tagging and low-coverage shotgun phylogenetics.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.
- First Taxonomically Curated DNA Barcode Reference Library for Polish Myriapods Fills an Important Knowledge Gap for Soil Invertebrates in Central Europe, Part I: Millipedes (Myriapoda: Diplopoda).Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Umbilical Cord: A Non-Invasive DNA Source for Sea Turtle Genomics.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Exploring the Quality of Historic DNA From Pinned Beetles.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Ancient genomes from Ladakh reveal 2800-year-old admixture between Tibetans and South Asians.Science advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-Locus Nuclear Marker Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Swiss Orthoptera Unveils Conservation Status Limitations.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Improved molecular kit-based workflow to unlock the genomic potential of historical coral type specimens.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Balancing Barcoding and Genomics: gDNA Quality in Insect Vouchers After HotSHOT DNA Extraction.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- Ancient genomes from Ladakh reveal 2800-year-old mixture between Tibetans and South Asians.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- DNA barcoding of Austrian terrestrial isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda: Oniscidea) reveals potential cryptic diversity.PloS one · 2026Article
- Redescription ofZooKeys · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial Genome Assemblies of Four "Bee-Assassin" (Hemiptera: Reduviidae:F1000Research · 2026Article
- Batesian Mimicry Converges toward Inaccuracy in Myrmecomorphic Spiders.Systematic biology · 2025Article
- Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods for aDNA Isolation from Teeth and Their Analysis: A Comparison.Genes · 2025Article
- Facilitating high throughput collections-based genomics: a comparison of DNA extraction and library building methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Sequencing RNA from old, dried specimens reveals past viromes and properties of long-surviving RNA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Skimming genomes for systematics and DNA barcodes of corals.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- Mitochondrial genome data provide insights into the phylogenetic relationships withinZooKeys · 2024Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ancient and archival DNA samples are valuable resources for the study of diverse historical processes. In particular, museum specimens provide access to biotas distant in time and space, and can provide insights into ecological and evolutionary changes over time. However, archival specimens are difficult to handle; they are often fragile and irreplaceable, and typically contain only short segments of denatured DNA. Here we present a set of tools for processing such samples for state-of-the-art genetic analysis. First, we report a protocol for minimally destructive DNA extraction of insect museum specimens, which produced sequenceable DNA from all of the samples assayed. The 11 specimens analyzed had fragmented DNA, rarely exceeding 100 bp in length, and could not be amplified by conventional PCR targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene. Our approach made these samples amenable to analysis with commonly used next-generation sequencing-based molecular analytic tools, including RAD-tagging and shotgun genome re-sequencing. First, we used museum ant specimens from three species, each with its own reference genome, for RAD-tag mapping. Were able to use the degraded DNA sequences, which were sequenced in full, to identify duplicate reads and filter them prior to base calling. Second, we re-sequenced six Hawaiian Drosophila species, with millions of years of divergence, but with only a single available reference genome. Despite a shallow coverage of 0.37 ± 0.42 per base, we could recover a sufficient number of overlapping SNPs to fully resolve the species tree, which was consistent with earlier karyotypic studies, and previous molecular studies, at least in the regions of the tree that these studies could resolve. Although developed for use with degraded DNA, all of these techniques are readily applicable to more recent tissue, and are suitable for liquid handling automation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.