Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24828041›Full record

ArticleNature2014

Cell competition is a tumour suppressor mechanism in the thymus.

Vera C Martins, Katrin Busch, Dilafruz Juraeva, Carmen Blum, Carolin Ludwig, Volker Rasche, Felix Lasitschka, Sergey E Mastitsky, Benedikt Brors, Thomas Hielscher and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 238 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Imaging Cell Competition in Ex-VivoMethods and protocols · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Transcriptional network dynamics in early T cell development.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Cell competition in development, homeostasis and cancer.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vera C Martins1] Division of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany [2] Institute of Immunology, University of Ulm, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.
Katrin BuschDivision of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Dilafruz JuraevaDivision of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Carmen BlumInstitute of Immunology, University of Ulm, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.
Carolin LudwigInstitute of Immunology, University of Ulm, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.
Volker RascheCore Facility Small Animal MRI, University of Ulm, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.
Felix LasitschkaInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sergey E MastitskyDivision of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Benedikt BrorsDivision of Theoretical Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas HielscherDivision of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans Joerg FehlingInstitute of Immunology, University of Ulm, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.
Hans-Reimer RodewaldDivision of Cellular Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversität Ulm · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell competition is an emerging principle underlying selection for cellular fitness during development and disease. Competition may be relevant for cancer, but an experimental link between defects in competition and tumorigenesis is elusive. In the thymus, T lymphocytes develop from precursors that are constantly replaced by bone-marrow-derived progenitors. Here we show that in mice this turnover is regulated by natural cell competition between 'young' bone-marrow-derived and 'old' thymus-resident progenitors that, although genetically identical, execute differential gene expression programs. Disruption of cell competition leads to progenitor self-renewal, upregulation of Hmga1, transformation, and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (T-ALL) resembling the human disease in pathology, genomic lesions, leukaemia-associated transcripts, and activating mutations in Notch1. Hence, cell competition is a tumour suppressor mechanism in the thymus. Failure to select fit progenitors through cell competition may explain leukaemia in X-linked severe combined immune deficiency patients who showed thymus-autonomous T-cell development after therapy with gene-corrected autologous progenitors.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticAnimalsCell DivisionCell MovementDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHematopoietic Stem CellsHMGA ProteinsHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPrecursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaReceptor, Notch1Thymus GlandHMGA ProteinsNotch1 protein, mouseReceptor, Notch1

Identifiers

PMID24828041
OpenAlexW2103177920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.