ArticleObesity surgery2014
Is resected stomach volume related to weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy?
Article in Obesity surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors associated with weight regain post-bariatric surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Pooled it
- Genetic variability in the leptin-melanocortin pathway and its role in weight loss.Molecular metabolism · 2026Review
- Resected gastric volume/number of staplers fired ratio as a tool in predicting complication and midterm results in sleeve gastrectomy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The rapid effects of sleeve gastrectomy on glucose homeostasis and resolution of diabetes mellitus.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2021Article
- Sleeve Volume and Preoperative Gastric Volume Assessment Using Three-dimensional MDCT Gastrography and Their Correlation to Short-term Post-Sleeve Gastrectomy Weight Loss.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Impact of Resection Volume/Stapler Firings-Ratio on Perioperative Complications and Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Correlation Between Preoperative Gastric Volume and Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Impact of 3D-CT-Based Gastric Wall Volume on Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2020Article
- Impact of Resected Gastric Volume on Postoperative Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2019Article
- High Resected Gastric Volume and poorly controlled DM2 in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2018Article
- Changes in Gastric Volume and Their Implications for Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2017Observational
- Effect of Resected Gastric Volume on Ghrelin and GLP-1 Plasma Levels: a Prospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016Observational
- A useful tip for resected stomach after sleeve gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2015Article
- Changes of lipid profiles after radical gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.Lipids in health and disease · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was initially performed as the first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch for the treatment of super-obese or high-risk obese patients but is now most commonly performed as a standalone operation. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate outcomes after LSG according to resected stomach volume.
methodsBetween May 2011 and April 2013, LSG was performed in 102 consecutive patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Two patients were excluded, and data from the remaining 100 patients were analyzed in this study. Patients were divided into three groups according to the following resected stomach volume: 700-1,200 mL (group A, n = 21), 1,200-1,700 mL (group B, n = 62), and >1,700 mL (group C, n = 17). Mean values were compared among the groups by analysis of variance.
resultsThe mean percentage excess body weight loss (%EBWL) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery was 37.68 ± 10.97, 50.97 ± 13.59, 62.35 ± 11.31, and 67.59 ± 9.02 %, respectively. There were no significant differences in mean %EBWL among the three groups. Resected stomach volume was greater in patients with higher preoperative body mass index and was positively associated with resected stomach weight.
conclusionsMean %EBWL after LSG was not significantly different among three groups of patients divided according to resected stomach volume. Resected stomach volume was significantly greater in patients with higher preoperative body mass index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24827404What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.