ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2015
Growth attainments of Indian children with type 1 diabetes: a mixed longitudinal study.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate distance and velocity growth of children with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) and quantify the magnitude of gender differences in anthropometric parameters.
methodsChildren with T1D, without any coexisting condition that could affect growth were measured at half yearly intervals for body weight, height, occipito-frontal circumference (OFC), chest circumference (CC), mid upper arm circumference (MUAC), triceps skinfold thickness (TSFT), biceps skinfold thickness (BSFT) and subscapular skinfold thickness (SSSFT) using standardized techniques. Comparison of these growth parameters was made between the 2 genders as well as with the published norms.
resultsOf the 115 children studied, there were no significant gender differences in weight at different age points. Boys measured taller than girls but the gender differences in height were significant only at 7 and 10 y. There was a tendency of higher BMIs in girls. In comparison to WHO standards and normal Indian children, boys had lower weight initially but became heavier later. The girls showed close similarity to their normal Indian counterparts but remained lighter than their WHO counterparts. After the initial lower height, an acceleratory trend was noted in boys but girls remained shorter throughout the study as compared to WHO peers. Boys, in general had higher CC, OFC, MUAC and MUAMC. The skinfold thicknesses recorded inconsistent growth patterns in both sexes. Growth velocities for various body parameters except skinfold thicknesses were similar in boys and girls.
conclusionsInitial weight and height loss followed by catch up growth was noted in boys. The values of MUAC, MUAMC and skinfold thicknesses as compared to data from developed countries, were lower in present patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.