ArticleSpringerPlus2014
Deposit of microbial strains in public service collections as part of the publication process to underpin good practice in science.
Article in SpringerPlus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and application of synthetic human gut microbial communities.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- HiBC: a publicly available collection of bacterial strains isolated from the human gut.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Dihydroauroglaucin Isolated from the Mediterranean SpongePharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Microbial Translocation in the Context of Hepatitis B Infection and Hepatitis D Infection.Open forum infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Chemical Diversity of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Brazilian Endophytic Fungi.Current microbiology · 2021Review
- Preservation, Characterization and Exploitation of Microbial Biodiversity: The Perspective of the Italian Network of Culture Collections.Microorganisms · 2019Review
- Public Microbial Resource Centers: Key Hubs for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) Microorganisms and Genetic Materials.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019Review
- Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol within the Collection of Institut Pasteur.Access microbiology · 2019Article
- Genome-based classification of micromonosporae with a focus on their biotechnological and ecological potential.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of the PhylumFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Review
- Global food and fibre security threatened by current inefficiencies in fungal identification.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016Review
- The Microbial Resource Research Infrastructure MIRRI: Strength through Coordination.Microorganisms · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite recommendations to release microbial resources to the community post-publication, the reality is far from satisfying. A workshop discussed the need for a coordinated and effective deposition policy for 'key' microbial strains and proposes a set of criteria to facilitate their deposition into public service collections. The majority of authors either contacted directly or during submission of manuscripts to several international, mainly European bacteriology journals agreed to this set of 'key strain' criteria and to the voluntarily deposition of resources into public resource centres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.