Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24825930›Full record

ArticleActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2014

Use of Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction (QF PCR) in Prenatal Diagnostic of Fetal Aneuploidies in a 17 Month Period in Parallel with Karyotyping.

Rijad Konjhodzic, Edina Dervovic, Ilvana Kurtovic-Basic, Meliha Stomornjak-Vukadin, Adis Muhic, Sumeja Baljevic, Aida Pirnat-Gegic, Ejub Basic, Nurija Bilalovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rijad KonjhodzicClinical Pathology, Clinical Centre, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Edina DervovicClinical Microbiology, Clinical Centre, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Ilvana Kurtovic-BasicClinical Pathology, Clinical Centre, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Meliha Stomornjak-VukadinClinical Pathology, Clinical Centre, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Adis MuhicClinical Pathology, Clinical Centre, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Sumeja BaljevicClinical Pathology, Clinical Centre, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Aida Pirnat-GegicClinical Pathology, Clinical Centre, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Ejub BasicClinic for gynecology and obstetrics, Clinical Centre, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Nurija BilalovicClinical Pathology, Clinical Centre, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionQF PCR has recently entered diagnostic practice as a possible way to bypass culturing of the fetal cells, as well as to provide a rapid response following amniocentesis. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe effective value of the QF PCR remains a much debated issue, positions ranging from that it makes classic kayotyping obsolete except in special occasions, to that it is no more than a guideline for a mandatory karyotype. Current practices of the gynecology specialists generates samples in such fashion that kariotyping of samples quickly falls behind to the point of obsoleteness, because, by the time a karyotype has been finished, a window of opportunity for termination of pregnancy has closed.

resultsQF PCR provides a rapid response alternative, but it is necessary to establish its reproducibility, as well as an algorithm of its use along classic kariotyping. This study contains samples processed in a period from August 1, 2012 to December 31 2013 in both QF PCR and classic karyotype. Object of this study was compare results obtained by two methods, and establish confidence interval of the QF PCR testing. Overall, 661 amniotic fluid samples were processed and typed with QF PCR, out of which 221 were done in parallel with karyiotyping, as an confirmation of results.

Indexed as

amniocentesiskayotypingQF PCR

Identifiers

PMID24825930
PMCPMC4008034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.