ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2014
Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection focusing on the technical aspect.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Pooled it
- Guideline
- Endoscopic Closure After Colorectal ESD: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on Its Efficacy in Preventing Adverse Events.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Risk of Postoperative Bleeding in Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients on Antiplatelet Therapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japan.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Timing of Oral Intake After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Risk Prediction for Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Colorectal Precancerous Lesions Using Artificial Intelligence: Retrospective Clinical Trial.Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2026Article
- Constructing and validating a risk prediction model for postoperative bleeding after colorectal EMR in the Chinese population: a machine learning-based study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Risk modeling of delayed postoperative bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Defect closure after endoscopic submucosal dissection decreased the adverse events in patients with large rectal neoplasms: a propensity score matching analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Establishing a nomogram for predicting the risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Resection of Early Colorectal Neoplasms Using Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Multicenter Observational Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Observational
- Article
- The feasibility of endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors.Updates in surgery · 2023Article
- Management of complications related to colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2023Review
- Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Efficacy and safety of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with sarcopenia.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Second-look endoscopy findings after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough delayed bleeding is a major complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal neoplasms, few reports have assessed the risk factors for delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD.
methodsThis study included 363 consecutive patients in whom 377 colorectal neoplasms were resected using ESD between April 2006 and August 2012. We classified patients and lesions into two groups on the basis of presence or absence of delayed bleeding and retrospectively compared the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of ESD between the two groups.
resultsDelayed bleeding occurred in 25 (6.6 %) of 377 lesions, and all cases of delayed bleeding were successfully controlled by endoscopic procedures. With respect to patient-related factors, there was no significant difference between the groups in mean age, sex ratio, and current use of antithrombotic agents. With respect to lesion-related factors, there was no significant difference between the groups in mean lesion size, growth pattern, and mean procedure time (p = 0.6). Lesions located in the rectum (vs colon, p = 0.0005) and lesions with severe submucosal fibrosis (vs no or mild fibrosis, p = 0.022) were significantly related to delayed bleeding. Upon multivariate analysis, lesions located in the rectum (vs colon, odds ratio 4.19; p = 0.0009) were significantly related to delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that location of lesions in the rectum was a significant independent risk factor for delayed bleeding after ESD for colorectal neoplasms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.