Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24825486›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2014

Sustained-release methylphenidate in a randomized trial of treatment of methamphetamine use disorder.

Walter Ling, Linda Chang, Maureen Hillhouse, Alfonso Ang, Joan Striebel, Jessica Jenkins, Jasmin Hernandez, Mary Olaer, Larissa Mooney, Susan Reed and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Walter LingIntegrated Substance Abuse Programs, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Linda Chang
Maureen Hillhouse
Alfonso Ang
Joan Striebel
Jessica Jenkins
Jasmin Hernandez
Mary Olaer
Larissa Mooney
Susan Reed
Erin Fukaya
Shannon Kogachi
Daniel Alicata
Nataliya Holmes
Asher Esagoff
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Hawaii System · USOASIS Clinic · USFriends Research Institute · US

Funding

The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials NetworkU10DA013045 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LING, WALTER NMN · 1999 to 2015
$52.6M
Sustained-Release Methylphenidate For Management of Methamphetamine Use DisordersR01DA025084 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LING, WALTER NMN · 2009 to 2012
$1.8M
Neuroimaging and Mentoring in Drug Abuse ResearchK24DA016170 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI CHANG, LINDA · 2003 to 2013
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA016170NIDA NIH HHS K24-DA16170NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025084NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA025-084NIDA NIH HHS U01-DA013045NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsNo effective pharmacotherapy for methamphetamine (MA) use disorder has yet been found. This study evaluated sustained-release methylphenidate (MPH-SR) compared with placebo (PLA) for treatment of MA use disorder in people also undergoing behavioral support and motivational incentives.

designThis was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design with MPH-SR or PLA provided for 10 weeks (active phase) followed by 4 weeks of single-blind PLA. Twice-weekly clinic visits, weekly group counseling (CBT) and motivational incentives (MI) for MA-negative urine drug screens (UDS) were included.

settingTreatment sites were in Los Angeles, California (LA) and Honolulu, Hawaii (HH), USA.

participantsA total of 110 MA-dependent (via DSM-IV) participants (LA = 90; HH = 20). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure is self-reported days of MA use during the last 30 days of the active phase. Included in the current analyses are drug use (UDS and self-report), retention, craving, compliance (dosing, CBT, MI), adverse events and treatment satisfaction.

findingsNo difference was found between treatment groups in self-reported days of MA use during the last 30 days of the active phase (P = 0.22). In planned secondary outcomes analyses, however, the MPH group had fewer self-reported MA use days from baseline through the active phase compared with the PLA group (P = 0.05). The MPH group also had lower craving scores and fewer marijuana-positive UDS than the PLA group in the last 30 days of the active phase. The two groups had similar retention, other drug use, adverse events and treatment satisfaction.

conclusionsMethylphenidate may lead to a reduction in concurrent methamphetamine use when provided as treatment for patients undergoing behavioral support for moderate to severe methamphetamine use disorder, but this requires confirmation.

Indexed as

AdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersCentral Nervous System StimulantsDelayed-Action PreparationsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHawaiiHumansLos AngelesMaleMethylphenidateTreatment OutcomeCentral Nervous System StimulantsDelayed-Action PreparationsMethylphenidateMethamphetaminemethamphetamine use disordersmethylphenidaterandomized clinical trialRCTtreatment

Identifiers

PMID24825486
PMCPMC4127124
OpenAlexW1871254996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.