Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24824893›Full record

Trial reportDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2014

Long-term changes in dietary and food intake behaviour in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.

L M Jaacks, Y Ma, N Davis, L M Delahanty, E J Mayer-Davis, P W Franks, J Brown-Friday, M Isonaga, A M Kriska, E M Venditti and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

L M JaacksDepartment of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Y Ma
N Davis
L M Delahanty
E J Mayer-Davis
P W Franks
J Brown-Friday
M Isonaga
A M Kriska
E M Venditti
J Wylie-Rosett
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USGeorge Washington University · USLund University · SEMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

PRIMARY PREVENTION TRIAL--DATA COORDINATING CENTERU01DK048489 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JABLONSKI, KATHLEEN ANN, TEMPROSA, MARINELLA · 1994 to 2021
$84.8M
Vector and Transgenic Mouse CoreP30DK017047 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sakeneh Zraika · 1986 to 2026
$41.4M
Core-010UL1TR001073 · NCATS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI KELLER, MARLA J, SHAMOON, HARRY · 2013 to 2017
$21.3M
Intramural NIH HHSNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001073NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK017047NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK048489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo compare change in dietary intake, with an emphasis on food groups and food intake behaviour, over time across treatment arms in a diabetes prevention trial and to assess the differences in dietary intake among demographic groups within treatment arms.

methodsData are from the Diabetes Prevention Program and Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Participants were randomized to a lifestyle intervention (n = 1079), metformin (n = 1073) or placebo (n = 1082) for an average of 3 years, after which the initial results regarding the benefits of the lifestyle intervention were released and all participants were offered a modified lifestyle intervention. Dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire at baseline and at 1, 5, 6 and 9 years after randomization.

resultsCompared with the metformin and placebo arms, participants in the lifestyle arm maintained a lower total fat and saturated fat and a higher fibre intake up to 9 years after randomization and lower intakes of red meat and sweets were maintained for up to 5 years. Younger participants had higher intakes of poultry and lower intakes of fruits compared with their older counterparts, particularly in the lifestyle arm. Black participants tended to have lower dairy and higher poultry intakes compared with white and Hispanic participants. In the lifestyle arm, men tended to have higher grain, fruit and fish intakes than women.

conclusionsChanges in nutrient intake among participants in the lifestyle intervention were maintained for up to 9 years. Younger participants reported more unhealthy diets over time and thus may benefit from additional support to achieve and maintain dietary goals.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorRisk Reduction BehaviorAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dietary FatsDietary FiberDiet, Fat-RestrictedDiet, ReducingEatingEnergy IntakeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFruitHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleDietary FatsDietary FiberHypoglycemic AgentsMetformin

Identifiers

PMID24824893
PMCPMC4307949
OpenAlexW2103694763

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.