Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24824831›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Biochemical analysis of DNA polymerase η fidelity in the presence of replication protein A.

Samuel C Suarez, Shannon M Toffton, Scott D McCulloch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel C SuarezDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Shannon M TofftonDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Scott D McCullochDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America; Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

TRAINING IN BIOCHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGYT32ES007046 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Seth William Kullman · 1985 to 2026
$5.1M
The role of human DNA polymerase eta in the mutagenic response to oxidative stresR01ES016942 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MCCULLOCH, SCOTT DAVID · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016942NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA polymerase η (pol η) synthesizes across from damaged DNA templates in order to prevent deleterious consequences like replication fork collapse and double-strand breaks. This process, termed translesion synthesis (TLS), is an overall positive for the cell, as cells deficient in pol η display higher mutation rates. This outcome occurs despite the fact that the in vitro fidelity of bypass by pol η alone is moderate to low, depending on the lesion being copied. One possible means of increasing the fidelity of pol η is interaction with replication accessory proteins present at the replication fork. We have previously utilized a bacteriophage based screening system to measure the fidelity of bypass using purified proteins. Here we report on the fidelity effects of a single stranded binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), when copying the oxidative lesion 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-guanine(8-oxoG) and the UV-induced cis-syn thymine-thymine cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (T-T CPD). We observed no change in fidelity dependent on RPA when copying these damaged templates. This result is consistent in multiple position contexts. We previously identified single amino acid substitution mutants of pol η that have specific effects on fidelity when copying both damaged and undamaged templates. In order to confirm our results, we examined the Q38A and Y52E mutants in the same full-length construct. We again observed no difference when RPA was added to the bypass reaction, with the mutant forms of pol η displaying similar fidelity regardless of RPA status. We do, however, observe some slight effects when copying undamaged DNA, similar to those we have described previously. Our results indicate that RPA by itself does not affect pol η dependent lesion bypass fidelity when copying either 8-oxoG or T-T CPD lesions.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA PrimersDNA RepairDNA ReplicationGuanineHumansMutation, MissensePyrimidine DimersRecombinant ProteinsReplication Protein AY-Family DNA Polymerases8-hydroxyguanineDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA PrimersGuaninePyrimidine DimersRad30 proteinRecombinant ProteinsReplication Protein AY-Family DNA Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID24824831
PMCPMC4019591
OpenAlexW2040755237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.