Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24824217›Full record

ReviewHuman molecular genetics2014

Human-induced pluripotent stem cells: potential for neurodegenerative diseases.

Christopher A Ross, Sergey S Akimov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human molecular genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Modeling Brain Disorders Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. New treatment modalities in Alzheimer's disease.World journal of clinical cases · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Genetics, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Progress in Polyglutamine Spinocerebellar Ataxias.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher A RossDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Psychiatry and Departments of Neurology, Neuroscience and Pharmacology, and Program in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MA, USA caross@jhu.edu.
Sergey S AkimovDivision of Neurobiology, Department of Psychiatry and.

Funding

Genomic and functional analysis of transcriptome changes in Huntington's DiseaseR01NS076631 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI DAVIDSON, BEVERLY L., ROSS, CHRISTOPHER A · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
The Huntington's disease (HD) IPS consortiumU24NS078370 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI THOMPSON, LESLIE MICHELS · 2012 to 2013
$2.6M
Immortalized Human Strital Precursors as a Cell Model of HDR21NS083365 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ROSS, CHRISTOPHER A · 2013 to 2014
$443k
NINDS NIH HHS R01NS076631NINDS NIH HHS R21NS083365NINDS NIH HHS U24NS078370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell biology of human neurodegenerative diseases has been difficult to study till recently. The development of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) models has greatly enhanced our ability to model disease in human cells. Methods have recently been improved, including increasing reprogramming efficiency, introducing non-viral and non-integrating methods of cell reprogramming, and using novel gene editing techniques for generating genetically corrected lines from patient-derived iPSCs, or for generating mutations in control cell lines. In this review, we highlight accomplishments made using iPSC models to study neurodegenerative disorders such as Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Fronto-Temporal Dementia, Alzheimer's disease, Spinomuscular Atrophy and other polyglutamine diseases. We review disease-related phenotypes shown in patient-derived iPSCs differentiated to relevant neural subtypes, often with stressors or cell "aging", to enhance disease-specific phenotypes. We also discuss prospects for the future of using of iPSC models of neurodegenerative disorders, including screening and testing of therapeutic compounds, and possibly of cell transplantation in regenerative medicine. The new iPSC models have the potential to greatly enhance our understanding of pathogenesis and to facilitate the development of novel therapeutics.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnimalsCell DifferentiationDisease Models, AnimalFrontotemporal DementiaHumansHuntington DiseaseInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsParkinson DiseasePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID24824217
PMCPMC4170718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.