Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24824016›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2014

European children's sugar intake on weekdays versus weekends: the IDEFICS study.

A Svensson, C Larsson, G Eiben, A Lanfer, V Pala, A Hebestreit, I Huybrechts, J M Fernández-Alvira, P Russo, A C Koni and 5 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating adolescent eating autonomy through ecological momentary assessment.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

A SvenssonDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
C Larsson1] Department of Food and Nutrition, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden [2] Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
G EibenDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Public Health Epidemiology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
A LanferDepartment of Epidemiological Methods and Etiologic Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology -BIPS GmbH, Bremen, Germany.
V PalaDepartment of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy.
A HebestreitDepartment of Epidemiological Methods and Etiologic Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology -BIPS GmbH, Bremen, Germany.
I Huybrechts1] Department of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium [2] Dietary Exposure Assessment Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France.
J M Fernández-AlviraGrowth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
P RussoUnit of Epidemiology and Population Genetics, Institute of Food Science, CNR, Avellino, Italy.
A C KoniInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
S De HenauwDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
T VeidebaumNational Institute for Health Development, Tallinn, Estonia.
D MolnárDepartment of Paediatrics, Medical Faculty, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
L LissnerDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Public Health Epidemiology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
IDEFICS consortium

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the intake of total sugars, foods and drinks rich in added sugar, and energy in children on weekdays (Monday-Thursday), Fridays and weekends.

methodsDietary intake (g, kJ, energy %) was assessed using a computerized 24-h recall method in a sample of 2- to 9-year-old children from Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain and Sweden who were participating in the IDEFICS baseline study (2007-2008). Analyses were performed in 9497 children by selecting one 24-h recall per child (for comparison of weekdays vs weekends, and Fridays vs weekdays and weekends). Selected stratified analyses were performed by country and age group.

resultsIntake of total sugars exceeded 20 energy % in all countries but one. In the non-stratified analyses, the intakes of total sugars and foods and drinks rich in added sugar were found to be higher on weekends compared with weekdays (both P<0.001), and intakes on Fridays were a mix between intakes on weekdays and weekends. Energy intake did not differ between weekdays and weekends. RESULTS were somewhat heterogeneous, both across countries and age groups.

conclusionsHigh intake of sugar remains an important nutritional problem in children of many European countries. Interventions aiming to prevent this diet pattern may optimize their impact by targeting dietary habits on Fridays and weekends. Furthermore, when conducting dietary assessment in children, data from weekends and Fridays in combination with a selection of Mondays to Thursdays are needed to capture habitual sugar intake. Age and dietary cultures should also be considered in dietary intervention and assessment as effect modifications were seen for both age and country.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorChildChild, PreschoolDietary SucroseEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallDietary Sucrose

Identifiers

PMID24824016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.