ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2014
Resuscitation preferences in community patients with heart failure.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Changes over Time in Patient Stated Values and Treatment Preferences Regarding Aggressive Therapies: Insights from the DECIDE-LVAD Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022Trial
- "If I have any problems, I just want to see my [primary care] doctor": perspectives on a proposed collaborative RUral PALliative care intervention (RuPal).BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators for cardiopulmonary resuscitation discussions with people with heart failure.PloS one · 2024Article
- "Do-not-resuscitate" preferences of the general Swiss population: Results from a national survey.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
- Differences in Characteristics, Hospital Care and Outcomes between Acute Critically Ill Emergency Department Patients with Early and Late Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Observational
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Preferences of People Receiving Dialysis.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Association of Do-Not-Resuscitate Patient Case Mix With Publicly Reported Risk-Standardized Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Early DNR Order and Long-Term Prognosis Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure: Single-Center Cohort Study in Japan.International journal of general medicine · 2020Article
- Do-Not-Resuscitate Status and Risk-Standardized Mortality and Readmission Rates Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2019Article
- Primary palliative care for heart failure: what is it? How do we implement it?Heart failure reviews · 2017Review
- The State of the Science on Integrating Palliative Care in Heart Failure.Journal of palliative medicine · 2017Review
- How to discuss goals of care with patients.Trends in cardiovascular medicine · 2016Review
- Activities of daily living and outcomes in heart failure.Circulation. Heart failure · 2015Article
- Understanding the epidemic of heart failure: past, present, and future.Current heart failure reports · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about the resuscitation preferences of patients with heart failure, how they may change over the course of the disease, and their association with mortality. METHODS AND
resultsWe enrolled consecutive Southeastern Minnesota residents with heart failure from October 2007 through September 2011 into a longitudinal study. Information on resuscitation preferences (Full Code or do-not-resuscitate [DNR]) was obtained from medical records through April 1, 2013. Of 608 patients enrolled, 237 died during follow-up. At enrollment, most patients (73.4%) were Full Code, whereas at death, most (78.5%) were DNR. The independent predictors of DNR status at enrollment were advanced age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous malignancy, and decreased mobility. Patients who were DNR were at increased risk of death (unadjusted hazard ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-2.73; P<0.001), but this risk did not persist after adjusting for age, comorbidity, and self-perceived general health (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.30; P=0.83). Of 481 patients who were Full Code during follow-up, 22 (4.6%) received cardiopulmonary resuscitation for an in-hospital cardiac arrest. Eight patients survived to hospital discharge; only 2 (9.1% of those receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation) made a complete recovery and returned home. The median time from a final decision to be DNR until death was only 37 (7,70) days.
conclusionsThe resuscitation preferences of patients with heart failure seem to be driven by the decline in clinical status that often accompanies advanced age and multimorbidity. Furthermore, these data suggest that electing DNR status does not independently affect a patient's risk of death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.