Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24823821›Full record

ArticleThe American naturalist2014

Generation time, net reproductive rate, and growth in stage-age-structured populations.

Ulrich K Steiner, Shripad Tuljapurkar, Tim Coulson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American naturalist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Birth-order differences can drive natural selection on aging.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ulrich K SteinerMax-Planck Odense Center on the Biodemography of Aging, Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 55 Campusvej, 5230 Odense, Denmark; and Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale U1001, 24 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
Shripad Tuljapurkar
Tim Coulson

Funding

THE MATHEMATICAL DEMOGRAPHY OF BIODEMOGRAPHYP01AG022500 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI CAREY, JAMES R. · 2003 to 2010
$8.1M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG022500NIA NIH HHS P01-AG0225000-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major insights into the relationship between life-history features and fitness have come from Lotka's proof that population growth rate is determined by the level (expected amount) of reproduction and the average timing of reproduction of an individual. But this classical result is limited to age-structured populations. Here we generalize this result to populations structured by stage and age by providing a new, unique measure of reproductive timing (Tc) that, along with net reproductive rate (R0), has a direct mathematical relationship to and approximates growth rate (r). We use simple examples to show how reproductive timing Tc and level R0 are shaped by stage dynamics (individual trait changes), selection on the trait, and parent-offspring phenotypic correlation. We also show how population structure can affect dispersion in reproduction among ages and stages. These macroscopic features of the life history determine population growth rate r and reveal a complex interplay of trait dynamics, timing, and level of reproduction. Our results contribute to a new framework of population and evolutionary dynamics in stage-and-age-structured populations.

Indexed as

Population GrowthAnimalsBiological EvolutionModels, BiologicalReproductionSelection, GeneticTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24823821
PMCPMC6601636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.