Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24823361›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2014

The evolutionary origin of somatic cells under the dirty work hypothesis.

Heather J Goldsby, David B Knoester, Charles Ofria, Benjamin Kerr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Asymmetry, division of labour and the evolution of ageing in multicellular organisms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reply to Cheong et al.: Unicellular survival precludes Parrondo's paradox.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  11. Origin of life in a digital microcosm.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multicellularity makes somatic differentiation evolutionarily stable.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Heather J GoldsbyBEACON Center for Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
David B KnoesterBEACON Center for Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Charles OfriaBEACON Center for Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Benjamin KerrBEACON Center for Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America; Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
University of Washington · USMichigan State University · USMichigan United · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive division of labor is a hallmark of multicellular organisms. However, the evolutionary pressures that give rise to delineated germ and somatic cells remain unclear. Here we propose a hypothesis that the mutagenic consequences associated with performing metabolic work favor such differentiation. We present evidence in support of this hypothesis gathered using a computational form of experimental evolution. Our digital organisms begin each experiment as undifferentiated multicellular individuals, and can evolve computational functions that improve their rate of reproduction. When such functions are associated with moderate mutagenic effects, we observe the evolution of reproductive division of labor within our multicellular organisms. Specifically, a fraction of the cells remove themselves from consideration as propagules for multicellular offspring, while simultaneously performing a disproportionately large amount of mutagenic work, and are thus classified as soma. As a consequence, other cells are able to take on the role of germ, remaining quiescent and thus protecting their genetic information. We analyze the lineages of multicellular organisms that successfully differentiate and discover that they display unforeseen evolutionary trajectories: cells first exhibit developmental patterns that concentrate metabolic work into a subset of germ cells (which we call "pseudo-somatic cells") and later evolve to eliminate the reproductive potential of these cells and thus convert them to actual soma. We also demonstrate that the evolution of somatic cells enables phenotypic strategies that are otherwise not easily accessible to undifferentiated organisms, though expression of these new phenotypic traits typically includes negative side effects such as aging.

Indexed as

Clonal EvolutionModels, BiologicalCell DifferentiationCell DivisionCell LineageComputer SimulationGerm CellsMutation

Identifiers

PMID24823361
PMCPMC4019463
OpenAlexW2084517549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.