Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24822174›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2014

Cancer wars: natural products strike back.

Christine Basmadjian, Qian Zhao, Embarek Bentouhami, Amel Djehal, Canan G Nebigil, Roger A Johnson, Maria Serova, Armand de Gramont, Sandrine Faivre, Eric Raymond and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Diversity Oriented Clicking for Modular Synthesis.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Screening ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christine BasmadjianTherapeutic Innovation Laboratory, UMR7200, CNRS/University of Strasbourg Illkirch, France ; AAREC Filia Research Clichy, France.
Qian ZhaoTherapeutic Innovation Laboratory, UMR7200, CNRS/University of Strasbourg Illkirch, France ; AAREC Filia Research Clichy, France.
Embarek BentouhamiL.C.I.M.N Laboratory, Department of Process Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University Ferhat Abbas Sétif, Algeria.
Amel DjehalTherapeutic Innovation Laboratory, UMR7200, CNRS/University of Strasbourg Illkirch, France ; L.C.I.M.N Laboratory, Department of Process Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University Ferhat Abbas Sétif, Algeria.
Canan G NebigilBiotechnology and Cell Signaling Laboratory, UMR 7242, CNRS/ University of Strasbourg Illkirch, France.
Roger A JohnsonDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Maria SerovaAAREC Filia Research Clichy, France.
Armand de GramontAAREC Filia Research Clichy, France.
Sandrine FaivreAAREC Filia Research Clichy, France ; Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital, INSERM U728/AP-HP Clichy, France.
Eric RaymondAAREC Filia Research Clichy, France ; Department of Medical Oncology, Beaujon University Hospital, INSERM U728/AP-HP Clichy, France.
Laurent G DésaubryTherapeutic Innovation Laboratory, UMR7200, CNRS/University of Strasbourg Illkirch, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural products have historically been a mainstay source of anticancer drugs, but in the 90's they fell out of favor in pharmaceutical companies with the emergence of targeted therapies, which rely on antibodies or small synthetic molecules identified by high throughput screening. Although targeted therapies greatly improved the treatment of a few cancers, the benefit has remained disappointing for many solid tumors, which revitalized the interest in natural products. With the approval of rapamycin in 2007, 12 novel natural product derivatives have been brought to market. The present review describes the discovery and development of these new anticancer drugs and highlights the peculiarities of natural product and new trends in this exciting field of drug discovery.

Indexed as

cancerdrug discoverymolecular targetsnatural productspharmacognosyprivileged structures

Identifiers

PMID24822174
PMCPMC4013484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.