Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24821983›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2014

The phosphorylation status of Ascl1 is a key determinant of neuronal differentiation and maturation in vivo and in vitro.

Fahad R Ali, Kevin Cheng, Peter Kirwan, Su Metcalfe, Frederick J Livesey, Roger A Barker, Anna Philpott

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phosphorylation and DNA damage resolution coordinate SOX2-mediated reprogramming in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. A low-level Cdkn1c/p57EMBO reports · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Insights and applications of direct neuronal reprogramming.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023
    Review
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fahad R AliUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Oncology, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK John van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0PY, UK.
Kevin ChengUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Oncology, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK.
Peter KirwanGurdon Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Su MetcalfeJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0PY, UK.
Frederick J LiveseyGurdon Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Roger A BarkerJohn van Geest Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0PY, UK.
Anna PhilpottUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Oncology, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK ap113@cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GBHutchison/MRC Research Centre · GBWellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute · GB

Funding

Department of Health II-AR-1109-11037Medical Research Council G0700758Wellcome Trust 092096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generation of neurons from patient fibroblasts using a combination of developmentally defined transcription factors has great potential in disease modelling, as well as ultimately for use in regeneration and repair. However, generation of physiologically mature neurons in vitro remains problematic. Here we demonstrate the cell-cycle-dependent phosphorylation of a key reprogramming transcription factor, Ascl1, on multiple serine-proline sites. This multisite phosphorylation is a crucial regulator of the ability of Ascl1 to drive neuronal differentiation and maturation in vivo in the developing embryo; a phosphomutant form of Ascl1 shows substantially enhanced neuronal induction activity in Xenopus embryos. Mechanistically, we see that this un(der)phosphorylated Ascl1 is resistant to inhibition by both cyclin-dependent kinase activity and Notch signalling, both of which normally limit its neurogenic potential. Ascl1 is a central component of reprogramming transcription factor cocktails to generate neurons from human fibroblasts; the use of phosphomutant Ascl1 in place of the wild-type protein significantly promotes neuronal maturity after human fibroblast reprogramming in vitro. These results demonstrate that cell-cycle-dependent post-translational modification of proneural proteins directly regulates neuronal differentiation in vivo during development, and that this regulatory mechanism can be harnessed to promote maturation of neurons obtained by transdifferentiation of human cells in vitro.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell Culture TechniquesCell CycleCell LineCell TransdifferentiationFibroblastsHEK293 CellsHumansNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurogenesisNeuronsPhosphorylationProlineProtein Processing, Post-Translationalascl1 protein, XenopusBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsProlineReceptors, NotchSerineXenopus ProteinsAscl1NeurogenesisPhosphorylationTransdifferentiation

Identifiers

PMID24821983
OpenAlexW2164258210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.