Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24821914›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

The application of transcriptional blood signatures to enhance our understanding of the host response to infection: the example of tuberculosis.

Simon Blankley, Matthew Paul Reddoch Berry, Christine M Graham, Chloe I Bloom, Marc Lipman, Anne O'Garra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Blood Transcriptomics of TurbotAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon BlankleyDivision of Immunoregulation, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, , London NW7 1AA, UK.
Matthew Paul Reddoch Berry
Christine M Graham
Chloe I Bloom
Marc Lipman
Anne O'Garra

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U117565642Medical Research Council MR/J010723/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in antimicrobials, vaccination and public health measures, infectious diseases remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. With the increase in antimicrobial resistance and the emergence of new pathogens, there remains a need for new and more accurate diagnostics, the ability to monitor adequate treatment response as well as the ability to predict prognosis for an individual. Transcriptional approaches using blood signatures have enabled a better understanding of the host response to diseases, leading not only to new avenues of basic research, but also to the identification of potential biomarkers for use in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment monitoring.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCommunicable DiseasesDrug Resistance, MicrobialHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansSystems BiologyTranscriptomeTuberculosisBiomarkersimmune responseinfectiontuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID24821914
PMCPMC4024221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.