Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24821898›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions: moving from what is the matter to what matters.

Elizabeth A Bayliss, Denise E Bonds, Cynthia M Boyd, Melinda M Davis, Bruce Finke, Michael H Fox, Russell E Glasgow, Richard A Goodman, Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts, Sue Lachenmayr and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Feasibility of a Multi-Component Strengths-Building Intervention for Caregivers of Persons With Heart Failure.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2023
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Informing the Design of Individualized Self-Management Regimens from the Human, Data, and Machine Learning Perspectives.ACM transactions on computer-human interaction : a publication of the Association for Computing Machinery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Building on the past: how historical research can contribute to our understanding of the spaces of general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Elizabeth A BaylissKaiser Permanente, Denver, CO (Bayliss); National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD (Bonds); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (Boyd); Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR (Davis); Indian Health Services, Nashville, TN, and Baltimore, MD (Finke); Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (Fox); National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (Glasgow, Heurtin-Roberts); University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO (Glasgow); Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Department of Health and Human Services and Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (Goodman); National Council on Aging, Washington, DC (Lachenmayr, Ruiz); Patient/Caregiver Advocate, Boston, MA (Lind); Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (Lind); Case Western Reserve, Cleveland, OH (Madigan, Stange); Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD (Meyers); Family Caregiver Advocacy, Kensington, MD (Mintz); Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (Nilsen); PatientsLikeMe, Cambridge, MA (Okun); University of Chicago, Chicago, IL (Ruiz); National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD (Salive).
Denise E Bonds
Cynthia M Boyd
Melinda M Davis
Bruce Finke
Michael H Fox
Russell E Glasgow
Richard A Goodman
Suzanne Heurtin-Roberts
Sue Lachenmayr
Cristin Lind
Elizabeth A Madigan
David S Meyers
Suzanne Mintz
Wendy J Nilsen
Sally Okun
Sarah Ruiz
Marcel E Salive
Kurt C Stange

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn isolated focus on 1 disease at a time is insufficient to generate the scientific evidence needed to improve the health of persons living with more than 1 chronic condition. This article explores how to bring context into research efforts to improve the health of persons living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC).

methodsForty-five experts, including persons with MCC, family and friend caregivers, researchers, policy makers, funders, and clinicians met to critically consider 4 aspects of incorporating context into research on MCC: key contextual factors, needed research, essential research methods for understanding important contextual factors, and necessary partnerships for catalyzing collaborative action in conducting and applying research.

resultsKey contextual factors involve complementary perspectives across multiple levels: public policy, community, health care systems, family, and person, as well as the cellular and molecular levels where most research currently is focused. Needed research involves moving from a disease focus toward a person-driven, goal-directed research agenda. Relevant research methods are participatory, flexible, multilevel, quantitative and qualitative, conducive to longitudinal dynamic measurement from diverse data sources, sufficiently detailed to consider what works for whom in which situation, and generative of ongoing communities of learning, living and practice. Important partnerships for collaborative action include cooperation among members of the research enterprise, health care providers, community-based support, persons with MCC and their family and friend caregivers, policy makers, and payers, including government, public health, philanthropic organizations, and the business community.

conclusionConsistent attention to contextual factors is needed to enhance health research for persons with MCC. Rigorous, integrated, participatory, multimethod approaches to generate new knowledge and diverse partnerships can be used to increase the relevance of research to make health care more sustainable, safe, equitable and effective, to reduce suffering, and to improve quality of life.

Indexed as

ComorbidityBiomedical ResearchChronic DiseaseCooperative BehaviorHealth Services ResearchHumansResearchchronic illnesshealth services researchmultiple chronic conditions

Identifiers

PMID24821898
PMCPMC4018375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.